A400 vs PM7200

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by alby, Jun 8, 2006.

  1. alby

    alby Its good enough for Jazz!

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sevenoaks , Kent.
    I have been happily listening to my Pioneer A400 for many years now, and a friend has just offered me his Marantz PM7200, I know that the Marantz had good reviews but from the specs I suspect that the Pioneer despite its age would still be better. Has anyone done an A:B Comparison? I would hate to do one and upset my friend by keeping the A400.

    Music I listen to ? well tonight it has been Finzi - Choral works , Joni Mitchell - Blue , Loudon Wainwright - One man guy , Kaiser Chiefs -Employment. and the system has always had to cope with all varieties of music.

    Kit, Linn Sondek , Arcam CD82 , Denon TU 260 , Rogers LS4a (due for replacement).
     
    alby, Jun 8, 2006
    #1
  2. alby

    Garmt

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    557
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think it will be a side-step... The A400 is very transparent and fast, the PM7200 softer and warmer. Don't be afraid to compare them I say!
     
    Garmt, Jun 8, 2006
    #2
  3. alby

    amazingtrade Mad Madchestoh fan

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Manchester
    I prefer the 7200 but that is just my opinion, both are very similar in specification and both run in class A. I think this is like comparing a BMW 530 to a Merc E320.

    It is just a matter of personal preference.

    The 7200 is a newer model though.
     
    amazingtrade, Jun 8, 2006
    #3
  4. alby

    Garmt

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    557
    Likes Received:
    0
    The A400 does not really run in class A, does it?
     
    Garmt, Jun 8, 2006
    #4
  5. alby

    hifikrazy

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2004
    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dont think it was. Friend had one and it never even ran vaguely warm, let alone hot enough to be class A.
     
    hifikrazy, Jun 8, 2006
    #5
  6. alby

    lordsummit moderate mod

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    3,650
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    In the Northern Wastelands
    The 400 is not class A. You could only try them, but I think you'd be comparing similair. You'd need to spend a bit of money to get significantly better than the Pioneer
     
    lordsummit, Jun 9, 2006
    #6
  7. alby

    Garmt

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    557
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree.
     
    Garmt, Jun 9, 2006
    #7
  8. alby

    davidcotton prog rocker, proud of it!

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    182
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Dorset
    If you were happy with the system BEFORE your friend offered you the amp, why consider changing it?
     
    davidcotton, Jun 9, 2006
    #8
  9. alby

    alby Its good enough for Jazz!

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sevenoaks , Kent.
    I am thinking of changing it because the Pioneer is getting on a bit , and he only wants £100 for the Marantz but if I am not going to keep it I could not buy it from him at so low a price .
     
    alby, Jun 9, 2006
    #9
  10. alby

    PBirkett VTEC Addict

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    2,456
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    The Toon
    Am I the only one who thinks the pioneer is a tinny, overrated amp?
     
    PBirkett, Jun 9, 2006
    #10
  11. alby

    amazingtrade Mad Madchestoh fan

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Manchester
    No, when I heared one back in 2000 I found it sounded quite thin, it had a lot of dynamic ability but the trelbe and mid range were too forward for my liking.

    I've not heared one or even seen one in recent years though hence the class A confusion.

    At £100 the 7200 is a bargain they go for £200 on ebay.
     
    amazingtrade, Jun 9, 2006
    #11
  12. alby

    Garmt

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    557
    Likes Received:
    0
    The A400 favours dynamic music, but it has some abilities most other amps lack. Just a matter of taste really... It could sound tinny especially with the wrong (budget) CD-player.
     
    Garmt, Jun 9, 2006
    #12
  13. alby

    cjm

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2004
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've lived with both amps for a couple of years now and have my own clear-ish view of how they compare. Usual caveat applies - it is all ultimately down to personal taste and depends on how the amp sits with your other components.

    IMO the A400 is still a star - I've never found the sound particularly thin or tinny as some have said - instead I'd say there's almost a valve like quality about it. The PM7200 has a better bass - very good indeed for its price - more definition, extension, but I've never settled with its mid band which I find a bit sterile in any setup it has been put into. On the other hand, I find the A400 has a richer mid band - particularly good with fast dynamic speakers, but not so good with speakers already predisposed to mid range thickening.

    Forget the class A hype on the marantz - though an excellent amp, changing it from class A to AB, in my experience, doesn't make an audible difference. I used to try changing with different music, then asked umpteen other people if they heard a difference, and no one ever did.

    Bottom line, IMHO, the A400, depsite its age, is still a great little amp and musical in a way, I've never really found with the 7200. They are also going for daft prices on ebay at present. It's phono stage is also, I think, better than the marantz one. If you already like the A400, you could find you lose something important to you if you change it for the marantz.

    Chris
     
    cjm, Jun 10, 2006
    #13
  14. alby

    taz

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2004
    Messages:
    218
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Nr Bolton Lancashire
    I have also heard both and my prefference was for the marantz
    maybe it's my set up but it just sounds more natural than the
    A400 with a warmer lusher sound, better bass extention and nicer vocals. I use a modded marantz cd 5001ose and am now planning to modd my pm7200 amp with a few tweaks, the great things about the modds so far is that i havn't lost any of the sweet sound of my kit, just improved the detail and base. I use modded b&w dm 603 s3 speakers and the system as a whole sounds realy superb, sweet warm virtualy no sibilance but good soundstaging and plenty of detail, making it ideal for long listening sessions without any harshness. I picked my pm7200 up for £179 brand new so i consider it a bargain and imo nothing has bettered it below £400 watch this space for more modding info ;)
     
    taz, Jun 10, 2006
    #14
  15. alby

    alby Its good enough for Jazz!

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sevenoaks , Kent.
    decision

    Having read your views I have agreed to take the Marantz off my friends hands ( it was causing matrimonial strife - big and ugly ) , if I prefer it to the Pioneer I will keep it , If I prefer the Pioneer I will sell the marantz on Ebay splitting the profits.
     
    alby, Jun 16, 2006
    #15
  16. alby

    hifikrazy

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2004
    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, i never particularly liked it, because i found it bright and tinny. However it does have some qualities that providing you partnered it well would make it a good listen.
     
    hifikrazy, Jun 16, 2006
    #16
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.