I did this simulation of Michael's room acoustics so thought I might as well post it up here for anyone who could be interested to see CARA at work. The system uses Wilson Sofia speakers, so I made a similar design in the CARA loudspeaker editor - Same size box with a 10" woofer, 7" midrange and 1" tweeter. Crossover at 110Hz and 2800Hz. Here is the original room layout. [IMG]http://www.audiosmile.com/forum/images/Acoustic-Simulation/Original-Layout.jpg[/IMG] Here are the simulated results for frequency response and sound arrival time. Ideally, the sound arrival time should be a flat line at the top of the graph, but as you can see there are frequency ranges where sound arrives later, which is due to reflections. [IMG]http://www.audiosmile.com/forum/images/Acoustic-Simulation/Original-Results.jpg[/IMG] So now we can try a couple of different speaker and listener positions. I let the computer run an optimisation process within some position limits for the speakers and listener. Two options came up as seeming to work better. [IMG]http://www.audiosmile.com/forum/images/Acoustic-Simulation/1-Layout.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.audiosmile.com/forum/images/Acoustic-Simulation/1-Results.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.audiosmile.com/forum/images/Acoustic-Simulation/2-Layout.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.audiosmile.com/forum/images/Acoustic-Simulation/2-Results.jpg[/IMG] As you can see, both options have a smoother frequency response than the original layout, however option-2 has a lot of spikes in the sound arrival time, meaning it might be a more coloured sound than option-1. So what if we keep the original layout but add some acoustic panels? Below is what happens when we add a 1m square 75mm thick foam absorber on the wall behind the listener. [IMG]http://www.audiosmile.com/forum/images/Acoustic-Simulation/Original-Layout+BkAbsorb.jpg[/IMG] If we compare that to the first set of results there are clearly far fewer late arriving sounds in the mid-high range. Great! How about also adding some absorbers on the pillars either side of the speakers? Well I tried it on all faces of the pillars, and the ones facing inwards towards each other seemed to help most. [IMG]http://www.audiosmile.com/forum/images/Acoustic-Simulation/Pillar-Absorber.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.audiosmile.com/forum/images/Acoustic-Simulation/Original-Results+BkAbsorb+PlrAbsorb.jpg[/IMG] Looking very nice now in the mid and high range, but those foam panels don't improve the bass, as you can see the response is still a bit ragged. Lets try optimising the positioning of the listener and the speakers now we have those panels in place. The layout not surprisingly looks a lot like option-1, but tweaked a little bit to make best use of the absorbers. [IMG]http://www.audiosmile.com/forum/images/Acoustic-Simulation/Option3-Layout.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.audiosmile.com/forum/images/Acoustic-Simulation/Option3-Results.jpg[/IMG] Okay that does seem to be the best balance so far :) The mid-high range has few reflections and the bass is smooth. Hope that helps Michael! Seems like adding a panel behind the listener is of great value, and if possible a little re-positioning will improve the bass too.