Any experience with the different LV Auditorium model?

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by Garmt, Oct 21, 2005.

  1. Garmt

    Ant

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ah now less refined bass is something that I dont like the sound of. Bottleneck I'll definitely let my ears decide, I'm not one for wasting money :)
     
    Ant, Sep 13, 2006
    #41
  2. Garmt

    Garmt

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    557
    Likes Received:
    0
    Don't take the 'less refined bass' too seriously, the differences are not that great as they seem in my post. There ARE differences to these ears, they are just not terribly obvious in a short listening session.
     
    Garmt, Sep 13, 2006
    #42
  3. Garmt

    Mike P

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2005
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi,

    I own Avatar OBX R2's and I have just received a pair of OBX RW's on audition. Having owned Mark 1 Avatars in the past, the OBX R2's are, to my ears, quite a significant step up from the Avatars. I do not have any experience of the Auditoriums so cannot comment.
    I have not yet spent long listening to the RW's but they are definitely better again although I suspect you need quite a good system to bring out the best in them. I am using the Resolution Audio Opus 21 CD player and Canary Audio 303 Signature monoblocks and they work well together.
    I hope to have more time to listen to the RW's this weekend and will post further details after that if people are interested.

    Best regards,

    Mike
     
    Mike P, Sep 13, 2006
    #43
  4. Garmt

    Ant

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    definitely interested Mike.

    I want to buy a pair of speakers I will live with for a long time.
     
    Ant, Sep 13, 2006
    #44
  5. Garmt

    bottleneck talks a load of rubbish

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,766
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    bucks
    I think you will like Living Voice speakers Ant, they are hard not to like.

    They need a lot of space, and need to be freestanding/uncluttered living room though.
     
    bottleneck, Sep 13, 2006
    #45
  6. Garmt

    Elberoth

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    0
    What is the difference between OBX, OBX-R, OBX-R2 and OBX-RW models ?
     
    Elberoth, Sep 13, 2006
    #46
  7. Garmt

    Garmt

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    557
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sure we are interested! Great system by the way! :cool:
     
    Garmt, Sep 14, 2006
    #47
  8. Garmt

    Garmt

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    557
    Likes Received:
    0
    OBX stands for 'Outboard X-over'. I thin the OBX-R is a revised version of the OBX and the OBX-R2 is a second revision.

    The OBX-RW has even better components in it's crossover and most of them have been cry'od.
     
    Garmt, Sep 14, 2006
    #48
  9. Garmt

    Ant

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well I am about to relocate from my lsitening room into the main living room. This is about 14 x 20 feet, 2 leather sofas and a couple of book shelves. Should be enough space.

    I'm looking forward to hearing them at the hifi show at the end of this month/
     
    Ant, Sep 14, 2006
    #49
  10. Garmt

    Alex S User

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2003
    Messages:
    588
    Likes Received:
    0
    Try to ignore the bloated bass that LVs seem to produce at shows since Canary and Border Patrol were ditched in favour of Kondo.

    Also, whilst it may be great for selling to rich people with yachts, I'm not sure the battery power is helping, even relative to the awful mains at these events.
     
    Alex S, Sep 15, 2006
    #50
  11. Garmt

    bottleneck talks a load of rubbish

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,766
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    bucks
    Its my own view that LV's are speakers that only work really well in certain rooms.

    At Def. Audio's headquarters in Nottingham (where they have a large converted mill as a demo-room...its ok for some!!) they sound spectacular in a way that few speakers can match - almost regardless of the amplification.

    I was blown away when I heard some boggo-Avatars with my cheap £500 second hand valve amplifier some 5 years ago.

    At home I never achieved the same kind of spectacular results, more of an averagey sound.
     
    bottleneck, Sep 15, 2006
    #51
  12. Garmt

    unclepuncle

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Northants
    Have to agree with Bottleneck regarding the importance of the room.

    Been to Definitive twice, first time was to audition a Sugden Masterclass CD (which was demoed with some OBX's and a Canary valve integrated) and having never heard of Living Voice speakers upto this point or heard a valve amp, I was totally blown away by them - to this day still the best sounds I've heard.
    Immediately went home and sold my Ruark Solstice speakers and then went back to buy some Avatars - initially Kevin had them wired up to a Sugden Masterclass integrated but the magic from the previous demo was missing - even Kevin admitted it wasn't sounding good - he blamed the industrial laundrette that is on the same ind.est for polluting the mains:) However, he then changed over to the Canary integrated again and the magic reappeared - if not quite to the same extent as with the OBX's.

    Once I'd got the Avatars home I could never quite get the same magic, although they still sounded mighty fine. My own room at the time was 12ft x 12ft whereas the one at Defintive is pretty big (I'm sure someone knows the exact sizes) with the speakers well apart firing across the room with loads of space behind them and plenty of toe in - if you can replicate that then you shouldn't go wrong.

    I subsequently also had a pair of Auditoriums (MKII) which sounded nice on the end of a little Densen Beat amplifier.
     
    unclepuncle, Sep 15, 2006
    #52
  13. Garmt

    Petergc

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2005
    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can easily believe that Auditoriums work best in large rooms. Their sound is open airy and uncluttered, but perhaps this is helped by the fact that I use them in a room which is 35ft x 25ft.
    As I mentioned earlier in the thread, I moved from asuditoriums to IBX's and can definitely hear a large difference.
    Both have a natural easy sound, but the IBX reveals far more bass information and has a more transparent presentation. Vocals in particular are exceptionally sweet, with the scanspeak revelator showing its class.
    I use them approx 10 ft apart, and set out 4ft from the wall, and find this works great for me. Many people have said that you need to be very careful with the degree of toe-in, but I'm not sure it makes much difference
     
    Petergc, Sep 15, 2006
    #53
  14. Garmt

    bottleneck talks a load of rubbish

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,766
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    bucks
    Hi Peter, that explains a lot.

    They really do need a big room - you're very lucky to be able to set them up as you have.

    I'm not convinced the degree of toe in is so important, more getting them the right distance from rear and side walls.

    In that respect (IMO) they are a bit like Quad 57's - not physically that big, but a little room dominating if you want them set up for optimal sound away from room boundaries.
     
    bottleneck, Sep 15, 2006
    #54
  15. Garmt

    Garmt

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    557
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree about the room they need... We recently did a show with the OBX-R2 in a VERY large ballroom (about 60 x 60 x 18 feet) and I was completely blown away by the sound.

    I do not get that in my 15 x 12 x 9 feet room...
     
    Garmt, Sep 15, 2006
    #55
  16. Garmt

    Ant

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just checked my new room is 14 x 12 x 8, perhaps I should be looking elsewhere.
     
    Ant, Sep 15, 2006
    #56
  17. Garmt

    bottleneck talks a load of rubbish

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,766
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    bucks
    It does sound a little on the small side to be honest mate.

    A decent pair of standmounts might be better.

    Maybe Proac 1sc - that's always a good one.
     
    bottleneck, Sep 15, 2006
    #57
  18. Garmt

    Alex S User

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2003
    Messages:
    588
    Likes Received:
    0
    Its great to visit Definitive, Kevin and Lynn are industry good-guys. One time I went with my Dynavector 1.2 to see if it worked (used with the Kondo pre). Not only did it work, it worked rather better IMO than the Kondo power amp. Kevin didn't say much for a bit.

    PS My room is 24 x 21 x 12 - about right!
     
    Alex S, Sep 16, 2006
    #58
  19. Garmt

    Ant

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    To be honest I have used my PMC FB1+s in the new room and they worked well in terms of balance and bass evenness. Small speakers dont do it for me in any way other than imaging.
     
    Ant, Sep 17, 2006
    #59
  20. Garmt

    Elberoth

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks. Hope to hear them this weekend during HiFi show..
     
    Elberoth, Sep 17, 2006
    #60
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.