How is an 'exotic and apparently inexplicable effect', demonstrable exactly?

This is sophistry, nay.

It only becomes demonstrable at the precise point at which it fails to become the 'exotic' (i.e undemonstrable)

Anyway, its merely 'resistance' which makes me a spoon bender?

If i acquiesce am i safe, even if it is not demonstrable to your satisfaction, and i still claim 'some exotic and apparently inexplicable effect'?

Your holding all the cards here?

The only way i can REALLY escape being a spoon bender is if i can objectify the subjective. i.e if science does not confirm it, i'm a spoon bender?

Honestly, it should be clear at this stage. I've no problem with doing a DBT, i just wouldn't do one through MY choice, mainly as i couldn't be arsed. I suppose i am doing myself a disfavour? Does this decision make me a spoon bender? I'd be happy to try and demonstrate it for someone elses curiosity, just not my own!