Reply to thread

Message

EXASPERATED.....

WHAT CAMPAIGN!!!???

I merely mentioned I felt they where unremarkable and insufficintly neutral (plus a number of other things) to be useful as quality control monitor in studios (a personal opinion that and thus not neccesarily shared by others).

You demanded data to support my assertations (eg that ATC's have poorely controlled dsipersion, above average levels of distortion etc.). When such data came into my hands I posted it. In other words, the whole "campaign" consists strictly out of one initial assertation ("ATC Speakers have several inherent performance flaws") in answer to your "ATC ueber alles" chants, plus answers to your challenges to this assertation.

Whatever "campaign" you conscrue exists only as figment of your imagination and because YOU created it. Get professional help, honestly.

I dislike many speakers and feel most fall woefully short of both the advertising claims and the neccesary standards for using them to monitor the quality of recordings. I merely objected to your "ATC ueber alles" mantra when you fielded it and I gave you reasons that consider reasonable.

I still stand by all I have written, which was primarily related to the objective performance at any extent.

So, the only campaign being waged here is yours to eliminate by shouting down any opinion contrary to your "ATC ueber alles mantra".

You can shout as loud as you will, stamp your feet, pound your fists against the wall and squeel all you will. I WILL NOT retract or recant and what has been made available in the public domain about the objectively measured performance of certain ATC speakers supports my contentions (which makes them neither true or false, merely better supported by data than yours). And repeating your propaganda claims for the 9876th time make them no truer than they where at the first time.

This has overall gone far enough.

If you still see any view that ATC's may have several fundamental flaws in performance (1) as concerted campaign against ATC then you really need your head examined. Maybe a few courses of ECT would restore your mental balance, well, I'll leave diagnosis and treatment to the professionals.

(1 - all speakers invariably are compromised somewhere, some more so others less, ATC In MY Not So Humble Opinion a little below average for the specific market segment)

(2 - and no doubt we are all in a great anti-atc conspiracy, meet occasionally and exchange funny handshakes)

L8er T

<blockquote data-quote="3DSonics" data-source="post: 619608" data-attributes="member: 1907">EXASPERATED.....WHAT CAMPAIGN!!!???I merely mentioned I felt they where unremarkable and insufficintly neutral (plus a number of other things) to be useful as quality control monitor in studios (a personal opinion that and thus not neccesarily shared by others). You demanded data to support my assertations (eg that ATC's have poorely controlled dsipersion, above average levels of distortion etc.). When such data came into my hands I posted it. In other words, the whole &quot;campaign&quot; consists strictly out of one initial assertation (&quot;ATC Speakers have several inherent performance flaws&quot;) in answer to your &quot;ATC ueber alles&quot; chants, plus answers to your challenges to this assertation.Whatever &quot;campaign&quot; you conscrue exists only as figment of your imagination and because YOU created it. Get professional help, honestly.I dislike many speakers and feel most fall woefully short of both the advertising claims and the neccesary standards for using them to monitor the quality of recordings. I merely objected to your &quot;ATC ueber alles&quot; mantra when you fielded it and I gave you reasons that consider reasonable.I still stand by all I have written, which was primarily related to the objective performance at any extent. So, the only campaign being waged here is yours to eliminate by shouting down any opinion contrary to your &quot;ATC ueber alles mantra&quot;. You can shout as loud as you will, stamp your feet, pound your fists against the wall and squeel all you will. I WILL NOT retract or recant and what has been made available in the public domain about the objectively measured performance of certain ATC speakers supports my contentions (which makes them neither true or false, merely better supported by data than yours). And repeating your propaganda claims for the 9876th time make them no truer than they where at the first time.This has overall gone far enough. If you still see any view that ATC's may have several fundamental flaws in performance (1) as concerted campaign against ATC then you really need your head examined. Maybe a few courses of ECT would restore your mental balance, well, I'll leave diagnosis and treatment to the professionals.(1 - all speakers invariably are compromised somewhere, some more so others less, ATC In MY Not So Humble Opinion a little below average for the specific market segment)(2 - and no doubt we are all in a great anti-atc conspiracy, meet occasionally and exchange funny handshakes) L8er T</blockquote>

[QUOTE="3DSonics, post: 619608, member: 1907"] EXASPERATED..... WHAT CAMPAIGN!!!??? I merely mentioned I felt they where unremarkable and insufficintly neutral (plus a number of other things) to be useful as quality control monitor in studios (a personal opinion that and thus not neccesarily shared by others). You demanded data to support my assertations (eg that ATC's have poorely controlled dsipersion, above average levels of distortion etc.). When such data came into my hands I posted it. In other words, the whole "campaign" consists strictly out of one initial assertation ("ATC Speakers have several inherent performance flaws") in answer to your "ATC ueber alles" chants, plus answers to your challenges to this assertation. Whatever "campaign" you conscrue exists only as figment of your imagination and because YOU created it. Get professional help, honestly. I dislike many speakers and feel most fall woefully short of both the advertising claims and the neccesary standards for using them to monitor the quality of recordings. I merely objected to your "ATC ueber alles" mantra when you fielded it and I gave you reasons that consider reasonable. I still stand by all I have written, which was primarily related to the objective performance at any extent. So, the only campaign being waged here is yours to eliminate by shouting down any opinion contrary to your "ATC ueber alles mantra". You can shout as loud as you will, stamp your feet, pound your fists against the wall and squeel all you will. I WILL NOT retract or recant and what has been made available in the public domain about the objectively measured performance of certain ATC speakers supports my contentions (which makes them neither true or false, merely better supported by data than yours). And repeating your propaganda claims for the 9876th time make them no truer than they where at the first time. This has overall gone far enough. If you still see any view that ATC's may have several fundamental flaws in performance (1) as concerted campaign against ATC then you really need your head examined. Maybe a few courses of ECT would restore your mental balance, well, I'll leave diagnosis and treatment to the professionals. (1 - all speakers invariably are compromised somewhere, some more so others less, ATC In MY Not So Humble Opinion a little below average for the specific market segment) (2 - and no doubt we are all in a great anti-atc conspiracy, meet occasionally and exchange funny handshakes) L8er T [/QUOTE]

Verification