Beastie Boys CD installs virus

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by technobear, Jun 23, 2004.

  1. technobear

    technobear Ursine Audiophile

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    2,099
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Glastonbury
    From The Register...

    "A new Beastie Boys' CD called "To the Five Boroughs" (Capitol Records), is raising hackles around the Web for reputedly infecting computers with a virus."

    See the rest here

    :eek:
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 23, 2004
    technobear, Jun 23, 2004
    #1
  2. technobear

    MO! MOnkey`ead!

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    4,881
    Likes Received:
    0
    :eek: :eek:
     
    MO!, Jun 23, 2004
    #2
  3. technobear

    julian2002 Muper Soderator

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,094
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Bedfordshire
    just turn autorun off! or use eac and set it to automaticly get the toc from the cd if it's running, rip it and then put the cd away in a box in your wardrobe.
    alternatively don;t buy it 'cos the beastie boys have only done about 2 good songs in their career (imoo) so the law of averages says this one will be totall sh*t too.
    cheers


    julian
     
    julian2002, Jun 23, 2004
    #3
  4. technobear

    MikeD Militant Nutter

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2004
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    0
    one step too far, i say!

    hope the record company & distributors get what's coming to them for this one.
     
    MikeD, Jun 23, 2004
    #4
  5. technobear

    angi73

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2003
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Essex/kent
    its uncanny how i had that very same cd in the drive when i read this post, fortunately though i have autorun disabled :)
     
    angi73, Jun 24, 2004
    #5
  6. technobear

    MO! MOnkey`ead!

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    4,881
    Likes Received:
    0
    Julian, I think it's MOre that you/I, shouldn't have to! Like MikeD says, surely gone too far?
     
    MO!, Jun 24, 2004
    #6
  7. technobear

    SCIDB Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,501
    Likes Received:
    1
    Hi,

    Good job I bought this on vinyl.


    SCIDB
     
    SCIDB, Jun 24, 2004
    #7
  8. technobear

    Tom

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    E Midlands, UK
    One step too far, I think.

    This is not the answer to illegal dowloads, nor is it legal in itself.

    I wonder, do the band know about this? I can imagine them not being too pleased at the thought of their music being used to distribute an illegal piece of software. Who knows, this could be the first time a band sues its record label for abusing their CDs?
     
    Tom, Jun 24, 2004
    #8
  9. technobear

    BL21DE3 aka 'Lucky'

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2003
    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Cambridge, UK
    Tom, according to the original article the band are aware of this 'feature' of their CD. However it is part of the record companies policy to install DRM software on the CD and so it is out of the control of the artist. Unless of course they change labels.
     
    BL21DE3, Jun 24, 2004
    #9
  10. technobear

    nsherin In stereo nirvana...

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    728
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Portsmouth, UK
    Copy-protected CDs are becoming a menace, but thankfully, CD-ex seems to be fine at ripping them all. Incidentally, Nero was able to copy Tubular Bells 2003 (which is copy-protected) without any problems.

    I notice EMI seem to releasing copy protected CDs with great regularity. When I tried to play a CD of Talk Talk the other day on my work PC. The sound card has been disabled by IT (must remdy that myeself). Although the CD player in Windows 2000 could play the CD as a normal Red Book Audio CD, it was terribly stuttery.

    Thankfully, it plays fine on my hifi's CD player at home.
     
    nsherin, Jun 24, 2004
    #10
  11. technobear

    Tom

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    E Midlands, UK
    Same with Audiograbber. All copy protection seems to do is add a few minutes to the time it takes to copy them, which strikes me as pointless. When you can downloard a free piece of software that will make a perfect copy of the music but without all the crap that comes with it on the original, you wonder what the point of the copy protection was in the first place.
     
    Tom, Jun 24, 2004
    #11
  12. technobear

    BL21DE3 aka 'Lucky'

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2003
    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Cambridge, UK
    Tom, the copy protection will/was intended to deter most members of the public who don't use tools like EAC, CDEX etc. to do their ripping, and instead rely on somehting like windows media player etc.
     
    BL21DE3, Jun 24, 2004
    #12
  13. technobear

    Tom

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    E Midlands, UK
    Then we must educate them!
     
    Tom, Jun 24, 2004
    #13
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.