Bi-amp method correct?

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by mallen, Mar 19, 2007.

  1. mallen

    mallen

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Quick question for you.
    When bi-amping a system is it better to have the amps
    seperated;

    Amp 1) Bass amp
    Amp 2) Treble amp

    or is it better to have;
    Amp 1) Left speaker
    Amp 2) Right speaker
     
    mallen, Mar 19, 2007
    #1
  2. mallen

    Hamilton

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    131
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd probably go for the latter if the amps are identical as you can locate the amps near the speakers and thus cut down on the length of the speaker cables. Also because the bass end of things is likely to be more demanding on the amp and in your second option you're sharing that out between the two. On the other hand with your first option you could have a more powerful amp feeding the bass as long as the gain of both is the same.

    Cheers

    Gordon
     
    Hamilton, Mar 19, 2007
    #2
  3. mallen

    Levi_501 Its in The Jeans...

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2004
    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    London
    Every manufacturer I have asked has said first amp for the HF the second for the LF.

    This is to do with equal loading on the outputs

    Running one channel HF and one channel LF, buts an unbalanced load on the amp, making it prone to failure.
     
    Levi_501, Mar 19, 2007
    #3
  4. mallen

    Joolsburger

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    510
    Likes Received:
    0
    Depends on the amps and the system. If the amps can be bridged to mono then B if not then A.
     
    Joolsburger, Mar 19, 2007
    #4
  5. mallen

    mhuk easily distracted

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Midlands
    Does it not depend on the amp? The manual for mine only shows one amp per speaker rather than HF/ LF.
     
    mhuk, Mar 19, 2007
    #5
  6. mallen

    Dev Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,764
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Ilford, Essex, UK
    I'd personally have one amp for treble and another (much more powerful one) for bass duties. Obviously both need to be gain matched.
     
    Dev, Mar 19, 2007
    #6
  7. mallen

    I-S Good Evening.... Infidel

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2003
    Messages:
    4,842
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    In a world of pain
    If using identical amplifiers then I'd favour the second option. It will reduce crosstalk significantly without disadvantage (no idea what Levi 501 is referring to... it will not affect the amplifier's reliability).

    However, since bi-amping with identical amplifiers is extremely ineffective, I'd be more inclined to go with Dev's suggestion of amplifiers optimised for their specific roles.

    Personally though, I'm most inclined to use one better amplifier across the board.
     
    I-S, Mar 19, 2007
    #7
  8. mallen

    stevehi-fi stevehi-fi

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2006
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    west yorkshire
    I have bridged power amps as monoblocks, therefore 1 amp per channel. All I have ever read has suggested the pecking order as monoblocks>Bi-amping>Pre-power>integrated. Just MHO
     
    stevehi-fi, Mar 19, 2007
    #8
  9. mallen

    SteveC PrimaLuna is not cheese

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2003
    Messages:
    854
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    SE Norway
    Linn are renowned/notorious for offering/tempting users of their speakers to active-multiamp, and I've been a heavy user until recently. Usually, their stereo cards for fitting in amps were within speaker, e.g., a treble-mid card for one stereo amp, but they also offered between-speaker, e.g., a bass-bass card. Their most recent range (Chakra amps) is only the former type, IIRC. I don't think there's much difference in practice, but these days I prefer to use monoblocks, which has a certin logic, as already noted.
     
    SteveC, Mar 19, 2007
    #9
  10. mallen

    Levi_501 Its in The Jeans...

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2004
    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    London
    I am not an electronics technician, but going on what manufactures have said to me when I have called their technical support team.

    They have all concluded, along the lines of having an unequal loads on the two channels, causes one channel to heat up up more than the other, also one channel will wear out before the other as the LF are harder to drive.

    Although I must confess I do not think of any wearing parts in an amp ???
     
    Levi_501, Mar 19, 2007
    #10
  11. mallen

    I-S Good Evening.... Infidel

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2003
    Messages:
    4,842
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    In a world of pain
    One will heat up more than the other (unless class A), but in a well designed amplifier this should not be problematic. Maybe the caps will age a bit faster, but no more than an amp where both channels are used for LF or LF+HF (both of which would be hotter overall).

    This is clutching at straws I feel, whilst the benefits in channel isolation of using separate amps for left and right are much more tangible.
     
    I-S, Mar 19, 2007
    #11
  12. mallen

    dreftar

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    490
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Shetland Islands
    My Speakers are Bi amped with 2 Monarchy Audio SM70 Pro's. I have connected them as per the manual. One amp for left the other for right. The amps in Mono Block mode Hi frequency speakers connected with phase reversed.
     
    dreftar, Mar 19, 2007
    #12
  13. mallen

    mhuk easily distracted

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Midlands
    "The amps in Mono Block mode Hi frequency speakers connected with phase reversed."

    Am I getting confused by terminology here? You have 2 monoblocks per speaker (one for HF, one for LF)? The SM70 manual is a masterpiece of confusing diagrams.

    What pre-amp do you use with your SM70s?
     
    mhuk, Mar 19, 2007
    #13
  14. mallen

    dreftar

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    490
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Shetland Islands
    I use one sm70 pro per speaker and connect as the bi wired speaker as shown on the diagram in the manual. Input from pre amp into Channel A - HiGH frequency connected in phase ie positive to Positive, Low Frequency connected to Channel B (Left Open) and reversed phase ie positive to negative.

    The Input switch is up for mono block operation

    The Pre Amp that I am using at the moment is the Tag MacLaren PA 10. One day I am Hoping to try out a passive pre amp with balanced outputs.
     
    dreftar, Mar 20, 2007
    #14
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
Loading...