Braun Electrostatic Speaker EL1

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by Labarum, Jan 16, 2011.

  1. Labarum

    Labarum

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    492
    Likes Received:
    2
    Labarum, Jan 16, 2011
    #1
  2. Labarum

    RobHolt Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Messages:
    4,126
    Likes Received:
    9
    I believe the input transformer isn't quite as good as that in the 57 because it had to be made smaller in order to fit the Braun.

    Love the looks though.
     
    RobHolt, Jan 16, 2011
    #2
  3. Labarum

    Labarum

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    492
    Likes Received:
    2
    Are there many about, Rob?

    The style looks more modern than the current Quad ELS!
     
    Labarum, Jan 16, 2011
    #3
  4. Labarum

    sq225917 Exposer of Foo

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,514
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not a huge number produced, they typically fetch more than the ESl due to the looks.
     
    sq225917, Jan 16, 2011
    #4
  5. Labarum

    theo

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    43
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Lincolnshire
    Designed for Braun by Dieter Rams in 1960 - and still looks incredibly contemporary. The matching hifi system hasn't aged as well, but there is a lovely wall-mounted version on the Vitsoe shelving system he also designed.

    I've a feeling that there is a German-based company who still have the licence to manufacture these speakers?
     
    theo, Jan 17, 2011
    #5
  6. Labarum

    Werner

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2008
    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Belgium
    Werner, Jan 17, 2011
    #6
  7. Labarum

    RobHolt Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Messages:
    4,126
    Likes Received:
    9
    Quads were always way underpriced, probably still are.

    Ross Walker makes quite plain in various interviews that both ESLs were a labour of love - and probably never made a penny.

    Thank goodness for love!
     
    RobHolt, Jan 17, 2011
    #7
  8. Labarum

    Labarum

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    492
    Likes Received:
    2
    Is there anything intrinsically expensive about the technology?

    If produced in big numbers would they be much, much cheaper?
     
    Labarum, Jan 17, 2011
    #8
  9. Labarum

    RobHolt Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Messages:
    4,126
    Likes Received:
    9
    Looking at how Quad produced the ESLs, production was always going to be costly. As Peter Walker said, making a hundred electrostatic panels is easy enough, but making them all perform within specification is time consuming and therefore costly.

    Large scale production and automation would clearly reduce production costs, but they remain both large (if you want bass) and expensive loudspeakers and I doubt there is a large enough market. More so in light of Fn's comments on the 'what next' thread.
     
    RobHolt, Jan 17, 2011
    #9
  10. Labarum

    rsand I can't feel my toes

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Messages:
    903
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Liverpool
    I had som esl's and loved them but they are not easy to place/room friendly enough to be mass market due to the amount of space they need compared to the amount of space people have
     
    rsand, Jan 18, 2011
    #10
  11. Labarum

    Labarum

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    492
    Likes Received:
    2
    Which is why I did not buy the ESL63, but the closed box Quarts noted below. They cost the same. I would have loved the Quads, but I was in the Army, always moving, and needed something that would just work anywhere.
     
    Labarum, Jan 18, 2011
    #11
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.