Micheal,

"Come on Tony that's a bit disingenuous. You won't find a single avionics engineer who would give credence to cable directionality and general "wanky wire" concepts that are bandied around in the hifi world."

I think it's fair if I use the resources, equipment & manpower & experiance of the company for R & D in the Audio dept, then it's relevent.

I did also spend 4 years on the digital pegeus fuel system concept for the Harrier and later the Tornado, give me a little bit of credit for wire apprication

Did I specifically use that example to cast in stone the directionality issue? nope, my point there was electrical generated and *other emmisions* emissions that may cause a potential problem with critical systems on a plane, maybe Mike they make be a direct connection between why our *wanky wire works* and use in HUD's, do you think I spend all day on audio Mike ?. The Audio is a side bar, main stay is the Techonolgy sir

However they do cross on more than one issue, and benfits can be extracted from the main use of such information.

Think I'll scotch the rumour I sit in an office soldering bullet plugs on wanky wire boys right now

Pete H, I agree, the bottom line is, I don't hold the rubber stamp, to approve it, but I can see the logic.

Credibility in cables  now you guys are having a laugh, So if we do publish a white paper and it's critrically acclaimed (for the sake of arguement), although our cables haven't changed sonically over night we're given the thumbs up, and they sell like no tomorrow, whats changed other than peoples *preceptions*, the cables haven't

Me just being a cynic ? we don't force the cable issue at all.

I'm on a hiding to nothing here, whatever I say, you'll find 1000 and 1 reasons to blast it.

Your all proberbly right I'm just under the influence of too much smelting fumes sorry to have disrupted your saturday  T.