Woolfie,

Well weather I decide by electron microscopic analysis/X-ray or tunnelling neutreno scans, or I just my ears, should I decide to shout about? Nah maybe I'll keep you guessing

My point about blind testing, is that it has a purpose but it's not the bottom line.

Now, where have I said in the previous post, the cables were directional?, I stated the cables were change for another cable, nothing more?. Yet a difference was dectected without question.

We are not in the business of satisfing your personal worries about cables or sheer dogmatic tendanices that every one who maufacturers audio cables is a cad and bounder sir (please forgive me If I gave that impression).

Simplicity is a key work I'm a great believer in KIS (keep it simple), and it pays off (for ourselves anyway).

I can go into the Nth degree of material properties, dielectric attributes, pairing twisting, opposed weaving, sheilding materials and radio magnetic rejection, only a few want to be intreagued.

A man with a piece of paper that says on a certain day at a certain I knew 'x'. no substitue for experiance

Experinace is the far greater bearer of knowledge

I'm not going to be offended if you don't buy anyones cables, far from it.

However one overridding factor here system tranparency, thats all I'm going to say.

So woolfie It's a solid prove if 7 out of 10 dbt er's say their cats preferred it?. Did they take the Pepsi challange ?

The test is simple, very simple, you either like or you don't, nothing added nothing taken away. sorry to disillusion.

You should work for social services Woolfie, your devotion to the subject is admirable