confused over DAC's

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by taz, Mar 20, 2011.

  1. taz

    Purite Audio Purite Audio

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    1,250
    Likes Received:
    1
    I haven't heard any difference between transports, why ould there be, unless the transport is doing some DSP of it's own or the DAC has a faulty s/pdif input.
    Keith.
     
    Purite Audio, Apr 4, 2011
    #21
  2. taz

    Tenson Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    5,947
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Kent, UK
    I once heard a difference with a transport, that used a SMPS, and I can only presume it put noise on the ground line that disturbed the clock recovery of the DAC. The sound of this transport was more hard and fatiguing than my other transport that had dual linear supplies.
     
    Tenson, Apr 4, 2011
    #22
  3. taz

    zanash

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    3,826
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Notts.
    sorry...complete hogwash

    any off your cloth eared lot want to pop round and listen to a £30 upsampling dvd player against a quad 99cdp through a
    dax decade is very welcome

    you will not be saying transports make no difference after

    then we could use any of my six other cdp's ranging from unmodded arcam a5's to super modded a5 a la avondale nd more ..a modded denon dc693[?]

    the reason cheap transport sound rubish is that there cheap ....if the case your trying to make is that a £25 dvd player via a decent dac can compete with a hifi cd transport then why doesn't everyone use them ?


    and if you insist in this charade at the very least you should not be offering such bias advice in my opionion.

    its such a simple thing to do ....to hear the difference , just nip up to tesco ...buy a sh*te dvd player and compare to your posh dedicated cdp. As I say I know ...I've done it just to check ......
     
    zanash, Apr 4, 2011
    #23
  4. taz

    nando nando

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,017
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    london
    look all , transports make a huge difference as we at the recording studios in mid and late 70's were faced with jitter and the myth that cd's could never suffer from layer damage, oh i give up, sorry.
     
    nando, Apr 4, 2011
    #24
  5. taz

    RobHolt Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Messages:
    4,126
    Likes Received:
    9
    Sorry that just isn't good enough.

    Tell us why a cheap transport is automatically inferior - show us the evidence please.

    I've a cheap own brand Maplin DVD player here that cost £35. Happy to put up some files for you to compare against a Meridian. You happy to take the blind test??
     
    RobHolt, Apr 4, 2011
    #25
  6. taz

    Mr_Sukebe

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    912
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    London
    Now that sounds like an interesting bakeoff. Let me know when you fancy doing it.
     
    Mr_Sukebe, Apr 4, 2011
    #26
  7. taz

    Neil

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2003
    Messages:
    631
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Scotland
    Nando -
    I think the key words here are "up to spec". If the data stream is fine (as it should be) and it's strobed ok to the DAC then there will be no differences detectable except by expectation bias/placebo/sighted test problems and so on. If the transport is not up to spec then yes there will be a difference - I've no idea if the "sh**te" players you mention are up to spec or not - if so then they will be, in performance terms, equal to the best of the rest! Tests of files produced as in the above "bake off" would be most interesting.

    I'm pretty much in favour of ABX blind tests to check these things out. This reminds me of an interesting AES paper (which passed peer review if I recall correctly, unlike a lot of the so called tests we hear about) containing fairly contentious results with reference to "hi resolution vs CD standard files".

    Here's a link to the paper and a bit of background:

    www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=14195

    www.bostonaudiosociety.org/explanation.htm

    Quite amusing.
     
    Neil, Apr 4, 2011
    #27
  8. taz

    Purite Audio Purite Audio

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    1,250
    Likes Received:
    1
    Neil Hi, recently at the Scalford show, a blind 24/96 v 16/44.1 comparison was run, with the participants able to choose between inputs at will.
    One chap managed to pick the 24/96 file every time, I asked him what he listened for and he said there was just less digital artefacts on the hires file!
    interesting experiment.
    Keith.
     
    Purite Audio, Apr 4, 2011
    #28
  9. taz

    Neil

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2003
    Messages:
    631
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Scotland
    ;-), but more digits
     
    Neil, Apr 4, 2011
    #29
  10. taz

    nando nando

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,017
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    london
    quote

    hi neal, good sense of theory on your response to this issue, how ever as this my last response to this thread unless one of you can answer this:
    transport not only reads the info on a cd but it has to create on the most capable memory of all information on data, bear in mind that dsta only goes to 196 khz, the transport has a duty to perform as to how much signal info to feed to the dac, there for both dac and transport mast match and co=ordinate to give as much info available, transports MATTER.
     
    nando, Apr 4, 2011
    #30
  11. taz

    Neil

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2003
    Messages:
    631
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Scotland
    I'll try to answer that in a sort of non-techy way, but before I do I'd like to agree with your "match and coordinate" statement - I think I know what you mean but I'd rather say it's the "coordination" you speak of and NOT the transport that matters.

    Firstly lets agree on the fact that digital data (which comes from the transport) is merely 1s and 0s.
    That being so if we do a little experiment - find a cheap £50 or so CD/DVD player with a digital output. Next if we were to "record" your favourite CD into your computer from this we'd get these same 1s and 0s - put the same CD into your computer drive and "record" it with EAC or another ripper. Finally borrow the most expensive CD transport you can get your hands on and "record" the CD again. The resulting sound files will be identical.

    Any difference in sound from a transport comes from jitter - the time alignment of the data ie the 1s or 0s being transmitted slightly earlier or later than should be the case. If you use a clock in the DAC this is eliminated (like the dpa deltran sync-lock I mentioned earlier - or the Linn equivalent) This is because when the "jittery" data arrives at the DAC, it is temporally quantized in sync with the DAC clock thus solving the problem to a great extent.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 5, 2011
    Neil, Apr 4, 2011
    #31
  12. taz

    Purite Audio Purite Audio

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    1,250
    Likes Received:
    1
    Transports certainly matter to all the dealers/manufacturers trying to sell them!
    Keith
     
    Purite Audio, Apr 4, 2011
    #32
  13. taz

    elis

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can you hear the difference between a well recorded original CD and a self-burned copy?
     
    elis, Apr 4, 2011
    #33
  14. taz

    Mr_Sukebe

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    912
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    London
    Clearly we have persons sat on both sides of the fence. I'd be happy to host a bake off. I have a couple of DACs that we can use, and an old DVD player kicking around.

    Who's up for trying this out?
     
    Mr_Sukebe, Apr 5, 2011
    #34
  15. taz

    Tenson Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    5,947
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Kent, UK
    Is it possible to do it blind? You'd need a digital switch-box that people can agree isn't going change the results.
     
    Tenson, Apr 5, 2011
    #35
  16. taz

    RobHolt Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Messages:
    4,126
    Likes Received:
    9
    Hi Mike,

    We can do it here.

    Two transports into a dac with the files uploaded so that anyone can download and listen.
    Thats a truly blind listening test.

    We can also take the digital outputs of a cheap DVD drive and something better and present those files.

    Plus of course try the null - difficult but pretty much 'case closed' if it works.
     
    RobHolt, Apr 5, 2011
    #36
  17. taz

    nando nando

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,017
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    london
    hi neal, i understand what you are saying, but answer me this, data read by source and sampled to match input to a dac does it not have to marry both data rather then going up sampling?
     
    nando, Apr 5, 2011
    #37
  18. taz

    Mr_Sukebe

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    912
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    London
    I'd prefer to do it at my place, simply because I believe my system to be fairly revealing and I know what it sounds like.
    I see no reason why we can't set the room up to allow blind swapping of kit around.
     
    Mr_Sukebe, Apr 5, 2011
    #38
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
There are no similar threads yet.
Loading...