A consumer watchdog is suing four of the world's biggest music labels in a bid to stop their use of copy-protected CDs. Belgian consumer company Test-Achats said on December 31 2003 that it will take Sony, EMI, BMG and Universal Music to court for infringing consumers' basic rights to access their private property. The suit follows complaints by Test-Achats' consumers, saying they were unable to make personal copies of their CDs or listen to them on a number of devices, such as car stereos and computers. “In this manner we demand a change in the big companies' attitude to music discs because copying a CD for personal use is not a crime,†the group said. Music companies launched copy-protected CDs to protect their artists' copyrights, reacting to rising piracy rates in Europe over the past few years. Though mainly aimed at protecting consumers against the companies' actions in Belgium, the suit could be the biggest legal action taken against the music labels in Europe. But the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), which supports the music companies, said the case has no legal basis. “European law is clear that record companies and other copyright holders have the right to protect their works through technical measures. The recording industry is labelling copy-protected CDs to inform consumers,†said the Federation's spokesperson. She added that some car manufacturers are now looking at the problem in relation to car stereos. Test-Achat's court action is also aimed at highlighting the importance of consumer rights in light of the EU copyright directive, which will soon be implemented in Belgium and other EU countries. The directive, which is already in place in Greece, Denmark, Italy, Austria, Germany and the UK, makes the circumvention of anti-copying devices a criminal offence. “We are not looking to get a political decision, but a legal decision which allows us to protect consumers' rights in the future,†the spokesperson for Test-Achats told MIP Week. The music companies are expected to submit their comments on the case on March 9. A full hearing is not expected before the summer.