Current State of CD vs SACD vs DVD-A

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by thespirit3, Dec 3, 2004.

  1. thespirit3

    thespirit3

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bristol, UK
    Hi All,

    I thought I'd check out the current status on the CD vs DVD-A vs SACD battle. However, it seemed even harder to find information now, than it did when the formats were first released.

    To add to my confusion, I now hear audio CD's have been issued with DTS mixes - these must be played in CDP's with digital outputs - and hence the decoder does the magic. But ... why the need for these? Surely those who want surround mixes would move to DVD-A or SACD?

    Anyway - back to my original question:- Which format is 'winning'? Do modern DVD video players also play DVD-A disks? Are there DVD-A players - which only play audio (not video)?

    A number of artists have released DVD video's now - but these appear to be nothing more than standard DVD video disks, and of the few I've seen theyr'e only using PCM encoding at 48 Khz (can't remember if 16 or 24 bit) - but that's still way under the full capabilities of the format...

    I'm completely confused when it comes to this new technology ... could someone bring me up to date?

    Thanks :)


    Steve
    Bristol, UK
     
    thespirit3, Dec 3, 2004
    #1
  2. thespirit3

    michaelab desafinado

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,403
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Lisbon, Portugal
    Brief summary as I see it:
    - SACD is "winning" (it has the vastly greater market penetration and reliable hybrid CD/SACD discs)
    - Only more expensive DVD players also play DVD-A
    - All players capable of DVD-A also play DVD-V
    - The vast majority of music DVDs are just DVD-V with a PCM soundtrack if you're lucky

    ...and finally....

    - both SACD and DVD-A are doomed to fail. To the vast majority of people who buy music they don't add anything they don't already get from CD.

    Michael.
     
    michaelab, Dec 3, 2004
    #2
  3. thespirit3

    wadia-miester Mighty Rearranger

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,026
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Beyond the 4th Dimension
    Just wait to you get Blu-ray'd :D
     
    wadia-miester, Dec 3, 2004
    #3
  4. thespirit3

    sideshowbob Trisha

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    3,092
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    London
    LPs appear to be the next big thing. They outsold SACD and DVD-A combined last year.

    Of course, they'll never catch on. :D

    -- Ian
     
    sideshowbob, Dec 3, 2004
    #4
  5. thespirit3

    merlin

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Messages:
    3,262
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually Ian, I suspect more forum members have invested in vinyl as a high resolution source over the past year than either of the new pretenders.

    It's bloody easy to hear why :D
     
    merlin, Dec 3, 2004
    #5
  6. thespirit3

    saddam

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2003
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Plymouth
    This is not always true. I have a £200 Cambridge Audio DVD player which does DVD-A and sounds bloody fantastic too :)
     
    saddam, Dec 4, 2004
    #6
  7. thespirit3

    thespirit3

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bristol, UK
    Thanks for the responses - it's good to see some of the old regulars still visit ZeroGain :)

    Interesting to hear LP's have outsold both SACD and DVD-A ... has the demand for LP's actually increased, or are SACD/DVD-A formats really selling that badly?

    If Vinyl is making (an abeit small) comeback - I'd be a very happy man.

    Steve
     
    thespirit3, Dec 4, 2004
    #7
  8. thespirit3

    Rory satisfied

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    1,084
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ipswich
    an £80 Panasonic DVDS35 also plays DVD-A












    probably not very well though :D
     
    Rory, Dec 4, 2004
    #8
  9. thespirit3

    amir

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2004
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    0
    SACD i think but about hardwares i think brands try to producing DAC vs CDplayer or producing cdplayers how have digital input.
     
    amir, Dec 4, 2004
    #9
  10. thespirit3

    JPHackworth

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2004
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi,

    My personal experience with hi-res audio:

    18 months ago I bought a Pioneer 656 universal player. I bought a bunch of discs (4 IIRC) in order to hear DVD-A and SACD. At the time I could only find a couple that I would actually have bought because I actually liked the music (Missy and The Police). Since then I've bought none, zilch, zippo. I have very catholic musical taste (Classical, Gabba, Jazz, Country, Techno, Punk, R&B) and a relatively large CD collection (circa 800 discs).

    If I can't find any new music which I want to buy on hi-res then what hope do the formats have?

    Long story short: I've given up on multi-channel and have gone back to stereo. CD in fact. I still have an AV system but that's all it is - AV.

    Oh, and I'm looking at buying a turntable.

    Regards,

    Jules.
     
    JPHackworth, Dec 5, 2004
    #10
  11. thespirit3

    Croc

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2004
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Israel
    my SACD expirience:
    - bouthght sony dvp-9000es dvd/sacd player 15 month ago
    - on SACD it sounds fantastic - better than meridian 588 and G-08
    - have 80 SACDs today - most of them jazz, some classical
    - my SACD wish list is very long

    there is no war between formats.
     
    Croc, Dec 6, 2004
    #11
  12. thespirit3

    I-S Good Evening.... Infidel

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2003
    Messages:
    4,842
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    In a world of pain
    I have 3 SACDs and no SACD player.

    Two of these were SACD-only albums, the other I'm not quite sure why I bought the SACD version, but there you go.

    Vinyl is slowly increasing in sales. DVD-A and SACD are faring appallingly badly. What really doesn't help is that next-generation formats are already appearing (Blu-ray, HD-DVD, SACD2) and compatibility appears to be shaky. And there are 3 competitors this time around...

    When new formats are introduced, it seems that often if there are two or more competitors, none succeed. CD had no similar competition at the time, but DCC and MD both failed to make much impact (MD moreso, but still not exactly a ubiquitous format), DVD didn't have any real competition (DVHS suffered the same fate as domestic DAT and DCC, being tape based formats). Now the high-res formats are fighting it out and I think we'll see another DCC/MD thing.
     
    I-S, Dec 6, 2004
    #12
  13. thespirit3

    andyoz

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,117
    Likes Received:
    0
    Interesting that there is no clear concensus on the state of the hi-res formats even on this forum. Considering that these formats are aimed exactly at users like us, i.e. people who care about the way things sound, it is obvious to me that they are in trouble. Most people are just staying put with CD's which makes me realise what a stroke of genius the CD introduction was (over 20 years ago!).

    It is interesting to compare this to the VHS vs DVD battle. No contest there as you could be half deaf/blind and still hear/see how much better the new format was.

    With SACD & DVD-A, I'd say one out of ten homes would have a hifi system good enough to justify the purchase of hi-res disc over normal CD's.

    As for the surround sound element of these formats, most users can't even set-up speakers for stereo properly so how will they manage with a 5.1 set-up.
     
    andyoz, Dec 6, 2004
    #13
  14. thespirit3

    PeteH Natural Blue

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    931
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    South East
    Thoroughly agreed. The CD format is intrinsically very good indeed, and throwing much higher bitrates at producing a "high-resolution" digital format hasn't actually produced much (if anything) by way of improvements over it, if the debates you get here and elsewhere are anything to go by.
     
    PeteH, Dec 6, 2004
    #14
  15. thespirit3

    thespirit3

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bristol, UK
    Interesting comments - I didn't realise the high definition formats were having so much trouble!

    I notice HDCD is also dead, with Microsoft now owning the copyright/patent (?) and practically no HDCD's being released :(

    I think I'll stick with good old CD (or vinyl) for the time. I can hear the difference between 16/44.1 and 24/96 (or higher) but as these formats already seem to be dead ... there's little point in investing. I notice there's a reasonable amount of Jazz available - and whilst i do like Jazz, I don't like it enough to justify investing solely for that one genre...

    Steve
     
    thespirit3, Dec 7, 2004
    #15
  16. thespirit3

    amir

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2004
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    0
    DSD is winner to PCM and DVD is winner to CD.
     
    amir, Dec 7, 2004
    #16
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
There are no similar threads yet.
Loading...