Reply to thread

Message

Actually, there is no such thing as the ''watts filter''.

Where are you getting these ideas ?

Can you prove to me that the ''less error correction needed''
( whatever that means) the better the sound ?

''The cd transport mechanism , the more spent the better engineered this can be, as in Esoteric/Teac VRDS NEO and most laserdisc assemblies.''

No. This is again false. The majority of transports are designed to strict specifications, and are more than adequate for their intended purpose.

What people fail to understand is that the cd format is already obsolete. Yet new cd players come out on the market at an alarming rate.

A friend of mine, Tim, from E.A.R was experimenting with higher sampling rates and so on in the early 90's, but it would only work if the cd was cut at that specific sampling rate.

The questions you ask only demonstrate your lack of knowledge. Have you tried looking it up ?

<blockquote data-quote="Johnny" data-source="post: 657688" data-attributes="member: 2740">Actually, there is no such thing as the ''watts filter''. Where are you getting these ideas ? Can you prove to me that the ''less error correction needed''&nbsp;( whatever that means)&nbsp; the better the sound ? ''The cd transport mechanism , the more spent the better engineered this can be, as in Esoteric/Teac VRDS NEO and most laserdisc assemblies.''No. This is again false. The majority of transports are designed to strict specifications, and are more than adequate for their intended purpose.What people fail to understand is that the cd format is already obsolete. Yet new cd players come out on the market at an alarming rate.A friend of mine, Tim, from E.A.R was experimenting with higher sampling rates and so on in the early 90's, but it would only work if the cd was cut at that specific sampling rate.The questions you ask only demonstrate your lack of knowledge. Have you tried looking it up&nbsp; ?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Johnny, post: 657688, member: 2740"] Actually, there is no such thing as the ''watts filter''. Where are you getting these ideas ? Can you prove to me that the ''less error correction needed'' ( whatever that means) the better the sound ? ''The cd transport mechanism , the more spent the better engineered this can be, as in Esoteric/Teac VRDS NEO and most laserdisc assemblies.'' No. This is again false. The majority of transports are designed to strict specifications, and are more than adequate for their intended purpose. What people fail to understand is that the cd format is already obsolete. Yet new cd players come out on the market at an alarming rate. A friend of mine, Tim, from E.A.R was experimenting with higher sampling rates and so on in the early 90's, but it would only work if the cd was cut at that specific sampling rate. The questions you ask only demonstrate your lack of knowledge. Have you tried looking it up ? [/QUOTE]

Verification