Reply to thread

Message

Hi,

Renegging on my own "good intentions".

Well, given that it took you six weeks or more (cannot be bothered to check) to find a basic equation on em fields and to mindlessly repost them and in the process misapplying them in ways a 1st year ee student would not, it appears the only scientist in memory to speak of who could have the right mentality to appreciate you would be Freud, definitly not Jung or anyone else of note.

It may come as a shock to you, but we do.

I never asked you for ANYTHING. To paraphrase you, you had hoped to learn from me.....

A corollary from the kybalion - "The lips of wisdom are closed, except to the ears of Understanding".

Okay. Here it goes:

"Why did you constrict your modifications to the Marantz CD Player you use to the analogue stage, given that the minimal possible use of a 100MHz 'scope reveals huge amounts of supply line noise in the digital section which invariably modulates the clock, thus inducing jitter, which, due to the propensity of the bitsream/delta sigma/time slicing DAC to fold above Fs jitter back into the audio band results in the classic "Marantz" sound which is strictly speaking a 'creative use of jitter artifacts'?"

Oh, and while we are it, illustrate why the equation you posted a few weeks back (I agree that it is mathematically/physically correct) in the cable thread has any bearing of consequence to the admittance of noise of any kind to a tightly spaced pair of conductors.

L8er T

<blockquote data-quote="3DSonics" data-source="post: 657737" data-attributes="member: 1907">Hi,Renegging on my own &quot;good intentions&quot;.Well, given that it took you six weeks or more (cannot be bothered to check) to find a basic equation on em fields and to mindlessly repost them and in the process misapplying them in ways a 1st year ee student would not, it appears the only scientist in memory to speak of who could have the right mentality to appreciate you would be Freud, definitly not Jung or anyone else of note.It may come as a shock to you, but we do. I never asked you for ANYTHING. To paraphrase you, you had hoped to learn from me..... A corollary from the kybalion - &quot;The lips of wisdom are closed, except to the ears of Understanding&quot;.Okay. Here it goes:&quot;Why did you constrict your modifications to the Marantz CD Player you use to the analogue stage, given that the minimal possible use of a 100MHz 'scope reveals huge amounts of supply line noise in the digital section which invariably modulates the clock, thus inducing jitter, which, due to the propensity of the bitsream/delta sigma/time slicing DAC to fold above Fs jitter back into the audio band results in the classic &quot;Marantz&quot; sound which is strictly speaking a 'creative use of jitter artifacts'?&quot;Oh, and while we are it, illustrate why the equation you posted a few weeks back (I agree that it is mathematically/physically correct) in the cable thread has any bearing of consequence to the admittance of noise of any kind to a tightly spaced&nbsp; pair of conductors.L8er T</blockquote>

[QUOTE="3DSonics, post: 657737, member: 1907"] Hi, Renegging on my own "good intentions". Well, given that it took you six weeks or more (cannot be bothered to check) to find a basic equation on em fields and to mindlessly repost them and in the process misapplying them in ways a 1st year ee student would not, it appears the only scientist in memory to speak of who could have the right mentality to appreciate you would be Freud, definitly not Jung or anyone else of note. It may come as a shock to you, but we do. I never asked you for ANYTHING. To paraphrase you, you had hoped to learn from me..... A corollary from the kybalion - "The lips of wisdom are closed, except to the ears of Understanding". Okay. Here it goes: "Why did you constrict your modifications to the Marantz CD Player you use to the analogue stage, given that the minimal possible use of a 100MHz 'scope reveals huge amounts of supply line noise in the digital section which invariably modulates the clock, thus inducing jitter, which, due to the propensity of the bitsream/delta sigma/time slicing DAC to fold above Fs jitter back into the audio band results in the classic "Marantz" sound which is strictly speaking a 'creative use of jitter artifacts'?" Oh, and while we are it, illustrate why the equation you posted a few weeks back (I agree that it is mathematically/physically correct) in the cable thread has any bearing of consequence to the admittance of noise of any kind to a tightly spaced pair of conductors. L8er T [/QUOTE]

Verification