Reply to thread

Message

Bub,

Maybe you havent heard the right digital front ends. Mine sounds nothing like this, it actually sounds clean and natural. someone else here has described it as sounding close to his analogue master tape/top end TT reference (his words not mine). Just because you havent heard a decent one yet, don't tar all CDPs with the same brush Yes, 24bit has more potential than 16bit, but you can still get bloody good results from 16 bit if it is implemented properly.

Hate to say this Ian, but I dont really understand why you are getting so wound up about all this and trying to convince us CD lovers that we are not on the one true path. Unfortunately you are beginning to sound a bit like some of the angle iron squad I am sure thats not your intention.

Gary, Thanks for those words of wisdom. Up to your usual standards I see

Time this thread was laid to rest.

Over and out, Robbo

<blockquote data-quote="Robbo" data-source="post: 494627" data-attributes="member: 1020">Bub,Maybe you havent heard the right digital front ends. Mine sounds nothing like this, it actually sounds clean and natural. someone else here has described it as sounding close to his analogue master tape/top end TT reference (his words not mine). Just because you havent heard a decent one yet, don't tar all CDPs with the same brush <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> Yes, 24bit has more potential than 16bit, but you can still get bloody good results from 16 bit if it is implemented properly.&nbsp;Hate to say this Ian, but I dont really understand why you are getting so wound up about all this and trying to convince us CD lovers that we are not on the one true path. Unfortunately you are beginning to sound a bit like some of the angle iron squad<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :("&nbsp; data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /> I am sure thats not your intention.&nbsp;Gary, Thanks for those words of wisdom. Up to your usual standards I see<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> Time this thread was laid to rest.Over and out, Robbo</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Robbo, post: 494627, member: 1020"] Bub, Maybe you havent heard the right digital front ends. Mine sounds nothing like this, it actually sounds clean and natural. someone else here has described it as sounding close to his analogue master tape/top end TT reference (his words not mine). Just because you havent heard a decent one yet, don't tar all CDPs with the same brush :p Yes, 24bit has more potential than 16bit, but you can still get bloody good results from 16 bit if it is implemented properly. Hate to say this Ian, but I dont really understand why you are getting so wound up about all this and trying to convince us CD lovers that we are not on the one true path. Unfortunately you are beginning to sound a bit like some of the angle iron squad:( I am sure thats not your intention. Gary, Thanks for those words of wisdom. Up to your usual standards I see:D Time this thread was laid to rest. Over and out, Robbo [/QUOTE]

Verification