If this petition gets enough support I'll compile and email it to HIFICRITIC. If it doesn't I won't bother. Thirty or more signatures would be a rough target. [B]Please read this:[/B] If you agree with the petition statement then post “I support this petitionâ€Â. This is sufficient to register your support. If you don't agree with the petition statement, for whatever reason, then please ignore this thread. The arguments have been well and truly aired, they don't need airing again. From [url=http://www.hificritic.com/editorial/aboutus.aspx]about HIFICRITIC[/url] [quote]We've called this magazine HIFICRITIC, because that's precisely what it's intended to be. Although British hi-fi journalists have built a fine reputation for high quality critical assessment of hi-fi equipment, current reviews seem to have become increasingly 'soft' and lacking in serious critical insight. Our intention is to scrutinise internationally important equipment in depth and detail, technically and subjectively, and to provide comprehensive investigations into the key issues and developments that are facing hi-fi today. Paul Messenger, Editor[/quote] [B]Petition Statement[/B] We the undersigned recognise the editorial aim of HIFICRITIC to distance itself from mainstream hi-fi journalism by being a genuinely unfettered critical voice and by offering to the reader serious critical insight, review and investigation. We ask HIFICRITIC to use scientific method to investigate the stubbornly contentious issue of cable sound. Such method involving listening tests. If HIFICRITIC considers present methods to be of insufficient resolving ability, for whatever reason, we ask HIFICRITIC to endeavour to find method it does consider will deliver meaningful results and can be practicably employed.