Isolda : Revisited

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by penance, Jan 9, 2004.

  1. penance

    penance Arrogant Cock

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    6,004
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Bristol - armpit of the west.
    Im sure people will remember me being not so impressed with my recent acquisition of Isolda.
    Well as i found out shortly after my initial reactions, there was other problems in my system (namely knackered solder joint in my amp)

    So a month on and an update.

    Well, firstly its here to stay!
    The effect it has had is not subtle (after the amp repair).
    It has done what i have been wanting, and for a blind s/h purchase i consider that a damn good bonus!
    The souns stage has improved a lot, maybe not wider but the third dimension has been added. Drums are now positioned at the back as opposed to just being quieter before. I think the width will never improve until i get a better room:rolleyes:

    Bass - that old cliche, is it less bass or more controlled. After throwing as much music as i can at it i have come to the conclusion it is one hell of a lot better controlled. Maybe it is less but i am enjoying the way it is. I use to find on vinyl in particular that the low end was wallowing in places and had a job getting itself up off the floor. Well it positively bounces along know with a tune :)

    Treble - This hasnt changed hugely from before, maybe clearer and better defined. But with the better bass control it is now much more balanced. detail is a lot better and things like cymbols sound more real.

    Mids - Again not a massive difference but well in timeing with everything else, a sweet midrange that has added some substance to the music.

    All in all it has that magic that can keep me up way past bed o'clock and regretting it in the morning.
    I now feel that im one positive step closer to being very content with my sound:)
     
    penance, Jan 9, 2004
    #1
  2. penance

    bottleneck talks a load of rubbish

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,766
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    bucks
    I know ju2002 has been trying some on his Naim amps and B&Ws.

    What did you think Ju?
     
    bottleneck, Jan 9, 2004
    #2
  3. penance

    julian2002 Muper Soderator

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,094
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Bedfordshire
    i'm still giving it some thought. in comparison to my old knackered naca 5.....
    the bass is slightly warmer and fuzzier - i think this is one of the reasons that people find it hard to move on from naca 5, for all it's other problems it does impose rigid control on the bass.

    mid is a lot sweeter and cleaner than before

    treble no longer strips the wall paper on badly recorded cd's cymbols crash and tizz with the best of them - a little sibilant but then so was the naca 5.

    i'm still trying to decide whether the trade off is worth it. i had a bit of a lynard skynrd session this afternoon and the bass on swamp music was lush however this doesn;t equate well with some of my more, shall we say, upbeat choices in music. gabba and some hard techno / trance / psytrance sound like the bass is a bit behind and disjointed which it never did with the naca 5.

    i'm going to play with my speaker positioning over the weekend a bit and see if that can fix the problem. if not then i've got some serious thinking to do - maybe reterminate my naca5 with some of those double wbt's and biwire....... or maybe not.

    cheers


    julian
     
    julian2002, Jan 9, 2004
    #3
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
There are no similar threads yet.
Loading...