Isotek mini sub?

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by jtc, Dec 2, 2005.

  1. jtc

    jtc

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The Fife Riviera
    Hi folks.

    A mate of mine has taken an Isotek Mini Sub GII as part ex against a TT he was selling. He's already fully Shunyata'd, so offered it to me for what appears to be a good price (£300, versus rrp of £500). I've already got a dedicated consumer unit and spurs, so would the Mini Sub be of any benefit to me?

    Just curious because the bumf on their website makes a lot of sense, but maybe that's only for folks without a dedicated mains spur/consumer unit?

    Anyone here using one? I've no interest in buying new if I can help it, and I wasn't planning on buying one before, but I'm an opportunist... ;)

    John
     
    jtc, Dec 2, 2005
    #1
  2. jtc

    Garmt

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    557
    Likes Received:
    0
    You have to try, it works in some sets, in others it doesn't. In my system, my Lavardin reacted in a negative way on an Isotek Orion, but with a MultiWay it performed better than with a standard consumer unit.
     
    Garmt, Dec 2, 2005
    #2
  3. jtc

    jtc

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The Fife Riviera
    Hmmmm... I'll have to try it, I know, but he's a way away so it could be a while before I get a chance to go collect it. My mains setup is, fyi, 4x6mm 32A spurs into double MK unswitched sockets, dedicated Memera 2000AD6 consumer unit. So, a little bit up from just a dedicated spur on a shared CU, but is the filtration and isolation really necessary...??
     
    jtc, Dec 2, 2005
    #3
  4. jtc

    Garmt

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    557
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hard to say... But with such good attention to detail in your current mains situation, I doubt the MiniSub will make much difference. It could even make the sound worse. I have never heard an amplifier perform better with it (o.k. I have: Quad 99).
     
    Garmt, Dec 2, 2005
    #4
  5. jtc

    jtc

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The Fife Riviera
    Hmmmm... #2

    I'll speak to my friend and see if he's got anyone lined up, and see if I can borrow it to try - and, of course, report back...
     
    jtc, Dec 2, 2005
    #5
  6. jtc

    Garmt

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    557
    Likes Received:
    0
    Niiiice! Let us know! :) I like the Isotek products, but like I said, they are not beneficial in all situations.
     
    Garmt, Dec 2, 2005
    #6
  7. jtc

    julian2002 Muper Soderator

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,094
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Bedfordshire
    i had the mk1 isotek - it worked well on my squeezebox, napsc, and video stuff however it killed my preamp (naim nac 82 2x hicaps) and power amp (naim nap 250). isotek say they've fixed this for the mk2 so definately worth a go but only if you can try b4 you buy.
    cheers


    julian.
     
    julian2002, Dec 2, 2005
    #7
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.