January in Iraq

A seriously disturbing chart from the "New York Times":

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/06/opinion/06chart.html

 

The aMOunt of civilian deaths in particular are very shocking!

 

But it is a war against the nasty nasty man who has invisible and hard to find WMD, and also helps to spread the freedom and democracy of the good old USofA.
So its all ok yea?

 

The nasty nasty man is very visible, he's in the White House and on the tv, and his name is 'George'. His WMD are very visible too and not hard to find, he uses them a lot. I think we should apply sanctions against him, he's not nice but dim and has an appalling human rights record.

 

I think the word you want to describe him is - arsehole.
He is, without doubt, the single most disatrous thing to happen in modern political history.
But it was that nasty nasty Saddams fault!

I still find it hard to believe that anyone who is so dumb as to forget to chew a pretzle before swollowing, manages to gain presidecny of the states.

 

If I were religious, and I am not btw, I would describe dubya as the spawn of satan - sent here to wreak destruction and to precipitate the end of the world.... :JPS:

 

Just remember that Tony Blair and Dubya are joined at the hip. It's not like Tony listens to us, and as far as I can tell, Dubya doesn't listen to his people either.

Some democracy.