M-Audio ( Midiman ) SuperDAC

Discussion in 'Classified Adverts' started by teaseme, Dec 10, 2004.

  1. teaseme

    teaseme

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    Messages:
    187
    Likes Received:
    1
    M-Audio ( Midiman ) SuperDAC ***SOLD*** thx

    Excellent condition, unmodified, c/w original wall-wart power supply. Also included : 1 pair of XLR-phono leads (1m approx) for output, if required. £110 incl post, incl. insurance to £100, within UK- sale due to DAC upgrade
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 13, 2004
    teaseme, Dec 10, 2004
    #1
  2. teaseme

    STELLABAGPUSS Happy Chappy

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    196
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Stourport On Severn,Worcestershire
    Can I Buy It

    HI,
    I WOULD LIKE TO PURCHASE THIS IF IT'S STILL AVAiLABLE
    YOU CAN EMAIL ME ON [email protected]

    THANXS
     
    STELLABAGPUSS, Dec 12, 2004
    #2
  3. teaseme

    michaelab desafinado

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,403
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Lisbon, Portugal
    Damien - it's net "etiquette" not to use caps all the time which is regarded as SHOUTING and people find it very irritating ;)

    Michael.
     
    michaelab, Dec 12, 2004
    #3
  4. teaseme

    manhar

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi Teasme, what u upgrading to?
     
    manhar, Dec 13, 2004
    #4
  5. teaseme

    teaseme

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    Messages:
    187
    Likes Received:
    1
    sold to DAMIEN my ears are hurting ! thank you will send tomorrow

    - upgraded to Apogee MiniDAC , supposed to be nicer sounding than Benchmark DAC1 in A-B listening tests (never heard Benchmark myself tho)
    very rich, forward, detailed sound. Benchmark more analytic. Copland vs Audiolab -ish !
     
    teaseme, Dec 13, 2004
    #5
  6. teaseme

    manhar

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Teaseme , would you be kind enought to let us know your impression of the Apogee Minidac. Thanks
     
    manhar, Dec 13, 2004
    #6
  7. teaseme

    teaseme

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    Messages:
    187
    Likes Received:
    1
    well initially it was *Very* rich & concentrated-sounding to my ears, almost (but not quite) painful, however when my new main amp (A1000) came back from the Musical Fidelity repair shop i began to appreciate it a lot more . Initially i didnt think i could live with it. I switched from a pair of basic studio XLR-phono leads to XLR-phono adaptors (bought from a pro hifi shop) combined with good quality phono interconnects, which made a big difference. Ideally, would use all-XLR interconnects, but my (oldish) amp doesnt have balanced inputs. Pity the Apogee (like the superDAC) doesnt have phono outputs, but it is primarily a studio DAC. Other main outputs '1/8th inch'.

    I think that i was also used to the usual sparse sound coming from sub £1000 CD players, & not used to full-bodied playback. However, the Apogee DAC is quite forward & intense-sounding & takes a few days' (sips) listening to get used to. Like tasting diluted white table wine then moving to a rich claret is the best analogy i can think of.

    Was torn between buying this & the Benchmark - slightly put off by the hype surrounding the Benchmark & the number of newish DAC1's for sale on audiogon (although they all go quickly). Some European hifi mags have (apparently) done A-B tests & preferred the Apogee as more musical, less sterile, but found the Benchmark slightly more detailed & bassy. I still find myself on the edge of my seat listening to the Apogee, it is intense & not a sound you would choose to relax to, counterpoint is it's very involving ! A friend heard it thought it sounded superb. Boils down (as most things) to personal taste. Should add that i use a 13 yr old Krell MD 1 transport which is also forward & rich, Apogee would work better with a more 'average' transport / CDP, but i still preferred the sound with the Krell to other CDP's used as transports, even though they were less intense & a better 'fit'.
     
    teaseme, Dec 13, 2004
    #7
  8. teaseme

    manhar

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for the assessment teaseme. Very helpful indeed.
     
    manhar, Dec 13, 2004
    #8
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.