michaelab and 7_V, thanks a lot - I was mulling over the wording for quite some time, I'm just glad I haven't come back to the thread to find 50 people voting for "other" and noone for anything else   And to those of you who found yourself between categories: well, four different answers were stretching it as it was I felt, never mind twenty or whatever to cover everything. I tried to put together what I thought were fairly representative mindsets - reading how people fit between them is quite interesting in itself though.

tones, we can pencil you in as a moderate objectivist in principle I think - you can always register a new username and stick in a vote for hardcore if it bothers you

The terms "subjectivist" and "objectivist" are a little loaded but everyone here has an idea of how we use them - and "subjectivist" must be better than "snake oil zealot"

We've currently got fewer than 40 replies, but assuming it's fairly representative it looks like there's no objectivist takeover just yet (about one-third or so), so the tweak purveyors still have plenty of target audience  . I'm surprised we've got so few (only 1 so far in fact) going for the first option - I'd expected considerably more than that to take the Russ Andrews line that ancillaries are everything, or at least of primary importance.