Spike, tenderfeet and bluetak.

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by wolfgang, Sep 13, 2004.

  1. wolfgang

    wolfgang

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    814
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Scotland
    Spike seems to be the prefer feet for the bottom of loudspeakers or stands. However, to my uneducated eyes in all manner of hifi religious believes they seem to be the chosen for mechanical reason then acoustic. After a bit of armchair research I comes up with these 2 articles of note.

    Jim Lesurf of University of St. Andrews provide a few more observations what they are really used for.
    http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/cones/speak.html

    He seems to suggest what I have been thinking all along simply they are good for keeping the loudspeakers firmly on top of carpeted floors. Since they could be adjusted individually it is also easy to keep the column of speakers or speaker/stand assembly level and upright. Then having a small contact area allow for a fairly firm attactment without the need for glue, bolts or screws. If temporary physical attachment are prefered bluetak provide a cheap and easy solution.

    An article in UHF magazine suggest it is a good way to reduce low frequency to be propagated into the floors and annoying the hell out of the bottom dwellers. Link is provide below. See comment at the latter half for the article. http://www.uhfmag.com/Issue63/soundproofing.html Experimenters could you place your upstair loudspeakers on spike and conform this observation? Might be a useful tip is it works.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 13, 2004
    wolfgang, Sep 13, 2004
    #1
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.