Tube Amps Over Solid State...?

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by nando, Dec 12, 2007.

  1. nando

    rollo

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    339
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    N.Y. U.S.A.
    Maybe its just me. When I play rock say Moody Blues or Jethro Tull on the Maggies it just does not do justice to the dynamics required to feel the power of the music. However when played through the Pipedreams its another ballgame.
    I prefer rock and large scale music with the Pipedreams and jazz and vocals through the Maggies.
    The pipedreams are driven by SET 211 amps and the Maggies by S/S go figure. Both use a tubed pre and source is tubed CDP and Linn TT.
    Just my experience. it appears to me that the music and speakers determine the amp choice. Just my opinion.


    rollo
     
    rollo, Dec 15, 2007
    #21
  2. nando

    nando nando

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,017
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    london
    some of the most famous guiterist always used tubes"valves" for their amplification, there must of being a reason why, i , when i used to work for island records in the 70's always used two types of amplication, ss as in amcrom "crown" and quad valves throgh tannoy monitors, both near field and open baffle stage monitors, though the amcrom's had that "so called welly" the valves where more of a pleasure to listen to, the issue that i find difficult to understand is when people say "OH THIS CAN NOT PLAY HOUSE, OR R&B ETC" the recordings of any type of music was and still is to how the engineer thinks it should be produced to the final stage,"most of them where far to stoned" to hear high frequencies and used either parametrics or graphics, hence some poor recordings came about,any system made good enough to a close sounding to the recordings that are made should be quite capleable of reproducing any type of music, otherwise we find ourselfs listenig to "hi-fi" besides music, i believe that no system is prejudice to music but the individual that preffers what sound that pleases him or her the most, sorry that's my view, right now i preffer valves,
    nando.
     
    nando, Dec 15, 2007
    #22
  3. nando

    lbr monkey boy

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2004
    Messages:
    837
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    In a happy place
    Most decent guitar amps do use valves, but that is because they are deliberately seeking out distortion and valves distort in a much nicer way that SS which tends to clip quite hard. Completely different ball game in hifi - I don't think anyone purposefully designs hifi amps to distort.
     
    lbr, Dec 16, 2007
    #23
  4. nando

    bottleneck talks a load of rubbish

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,766
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    bucks
    Hi LBR

    I think that's true for guitarists looking for a distorted tone from an overdriven valve amp.

    However, many guitarists like the sound of a valve amp for clean settings. A Fender twin reverb springs to mind as an obvious example.
     
    bottleneck, Dec 16, 2007
    #24
  5. nando

    Rodrigo de Sá This club's crushing bore

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,040
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Lisbon
    Lavardin is a good compromise, plus transparency. I also like the Jadis, but they get too hot.
     
    Rodrigo de Sá, Dec 16, 2007
    #25
  6. nando

    Pure_Carbon Diamond Tipped.

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    26" in front of my screen.
    I've recently gone valve and am loving them!
    They don't quite have the attack of solid state but certainly have everything else.
    I'm now using a pair of PrimaLuna Prologue 6 monoblocks , but a solid state pre (Dynavector L200) and a solid state phono stage (Whest 2.0 or something...) and I like this combo.
     
    Pure_Carbon, Dec 18, 2007
    #26
  7. nando

    Vinylnutter

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    I had a set of Audio Innovations series 1000 monos, they lasted 6 months then each in turn exploded and caught fire....ah the ineffiable magic of tubes:rolleyes:
     
    Vinylnutter, Dec 18, 2007
    #27
  8. nando

    Purite Audio Purite Audio

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    1,250
    Likes Received:
    1
    Surely it is horses for courses, if you have inefficient speakers , or speakers with a claimed sensitivity which are in fact inefficient, then surely a high current delivery amp would really get the best from the speakers.
    Personally my speakers are pretty efficient and switching to valves gave the sound a life and realism that I had never experienced with solid state.
     
    Purite Audio, Dec 18, 2007
    #28
  9. nando

    shonamh

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is me... if you count my new Fatman iTube... I know it's not really hi-fi (though I'm loving it!) but I seem to be listening less and less to CDs etc on my ageing separates system, so when I saw it...

    I grew up with my dad's Williams (I'm sure that's what it was called) amplifier that he built himself in a massive cabinet to go with massive home made speakers.

    I think some of it must be genetic - I think he'd be proud of my iTube is a small way...!

    Be nice to me, I'm only new.
    :)
     
    shonamh, Feb 12, 2008
    #29
  10. nando

    bottleneck talks a load of rubbish

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,766
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    bucks
    I've had ''flames'' from valve amps before - once in front of a Zerogain audience!! - quite impressive.

    I now think valve amps being simple in construction and preferably hard-wired makes a lot of sense for when the inevitable happens. Easy to spot the blown component, easy to replace it too.

    A friend has ''protection circuits galore'' instead, and that seems a sensible alternative.
     
    bottleneck, Feb 12, 2008
    #30
  11. nando

    larkrise Sheepdogs prefer red wine

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2005
    Messages:
    735
    Likes Received:
    0
    Having messed around with passives, SS, valves I finally believe I know what works for me. It's valves for pre and solid state for power. Re phono - seem to prefer valve and transformer stepup combo. That's a definitely maybe.
     
    larkrise, Feb 12, 2008
    #31
  12. nando

    Dev Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,764
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Ilford, Essex, UK
    Are you sure about that or would you like to think about it and come back next week for a more definitive answer. A sort of definitive definite maybe:D.
     
    Dev, Feb 12, 2008
    #32
  13. nando

    larkrise Sheepdogs prefer red wine

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2005
    Messages:
    735
    Likes Received:
    0
    No - have decided, that's it. Definitely defintely definite. :D
     
    larkrise, Feb 12, 2008
    #33
  14. nando

    thrudge

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    174
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would respectfully beg to differ :) I once tried a a Rogue Audio valve pre-power, and it had amazing speed, slam, and bass weight. Tight, as well. Headbanging? I was playing Motorhead, AC/DC, and Marilyn Manson. I doubt those that bangeth head would react with anything less than a big grin to the sound I was getting. Chemical Brothers sounded awesome, too.

    My own preference is for valves, and of the four valve amps I've tried in my system, I'd broadly agree with you; but the Rogues produced a, er....'rogue' result. If it wasn't for the intrusive hiss they produced through my mega-sensitive speakers, I'd have kept them. (I'd probably have had an eviction notice and a Motorheadache by now, though...)

    So, maybe it's more to do with implementation than valve technology per se?
     
    thrudge, Feb 13, 2008
    #34
  15. nando

    Dev Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,764
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Ilford, Essex, UK
    I have a Rogue Stereo 90 power amp driving Tannoy D700, which I think are quite sensitive at 91db, if you believe the manufacturers figures. But I don't hear any hiss. I don't have a Rogue pre though.

    Anyway I agree valves can produce slam and bass weight.
     
    Dev, Feb 13, 2008
    #35
  16. nando

    Dynamic Turtle The Bydo Destroyer

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    935
    Likes Received:
    0
    Rogue Power amp here too - the 88. Very good VFM.

    It's valves all the way for me - Phono, pre, power. Solid state just doesn't sound right at all. Tubes can be tonally off the pace too, but what I'm talking about is all the horrid audiophile cliches or vocals, air, space, timbre, tone etc.

    Something that was brought home to me at the hifi shows I've been too. Tube systems sounded much better to my ears than SS systems.

    HOWEVER,

    There are definitely some SS amps I'd like to try, like Luxman, Ayre, Levinson and Krell. Purely out of curiosity.

    Pathos make some very nice hybrids though. That DK Designs amp is a belter too!

    Valves can be a pain in the neck, but I think the hassle is worth it.

    DT
     
    Dynamic Turtle, Feb 13, 2008
    #36
  17. nando

    rollo

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    339
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    N.Y. U.S.A.

    I reads them. Love your input. Hope all is well.


    rollo
     
    rollo, Feb 13, 2008
    #37
  18. nando

    rollo

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    339
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    N.Y. U.S.A.

    Now is that Joe pass or Ted Nugent. All guitarists are not the same. I agree with your example.


    rollo
     
    rollo, Feb 13, 2008
    #38
  19. nando

    Johnj

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    I use an SAC KT88 Glowmaster and it really rocks even better than my 200w power amp (solid state) I used to own
     
    Johnj, Feb 13, 2008
    #39
  20. nando

    Dev Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,764
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Ilford, Essex, UK
    Hi John,

    I remember comparing a 10WPC Leak Stereo 20 and against a 200WPC SS and preferring the Leak. I still hate Ian (Sideshowbob) for that:D.
     
    Dev, Feb 13, 2008
    #40
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.