who makes the best volume pots / stepped attenuators?

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by Dynamic Turtle, Apr 6, 2006.

  1. Dynamic Turtle

    Dynamic Turtle The Bydo Destroyer

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    935
    Likes Received:
    0
    Probably more of a DIY question, but I think it belongs in the hi-fi section, given how overlooked this important function seems to be...

    I've heard Vishay stepped attenuators are very good for the money, as are ALPS Blue, but do the aforesaid companies (or anyone else for that matter) make higher quality steppies & pots for use in more expensive pre-amps?

    Why are ALPS Blue pots so ubiquitous? See them in everything from £200 Ming-Da's to £3000 Arcam's....

    Can anyone give me some ideas/examples of sub £2k pre-amps with super-duper pots/steppers (passive pre's included)?

    Rgds
    DT
     
    Dynamic Turtle, Apr 6, 2006
    #1
  2. Dynamic Turtle

    Tenson Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    5,947
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Kent, UK
    IIRC Alps do make a super-dooper one but it is REALLY expensive. It is black I think.

    If you want something much better, you really need to look at transformers I think...

    As someone recently pointed out to me, if you have an amp with negative feedback you can re-wire the feedback loop so the pot becomes one of the resistors and thus you can adjust the volume but adjusting the amount of feedback. This cuts out a lot of the problems with the normal way of doing things.
     
    Tenson, Apr 6, 2006
    #2
  3. Dynamic Turtle

    felix part-time Horta

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2003
    Messages:
    757
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    dead
    No it does not - it means the amps bandwidth, noise and distortion performance (and for some topologies, stability too) will vary hugely depending on the pot setting. Not recommended.

    PS. early DPA kit used Penny & Giles pots - very nice!
     
    felix, Apr 6, 2006
    #3
  4. Dynamic Turtle

    Tenson Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    5,947
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Kent, UK
    Perhaps I misunderstood what was said to me then. It was definitely to do with using it in part of the feedback loop. I can find the email when I get back home if you like.
     
    Tenson, Apr 6, 2006
    #4
  5. Dynamic Turtle

    felix part-time Horta

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2003
    Messages:
    757
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    dead
    Oh yes, what you proposed works OK, but only for varying gain over a very narrow window - not useful for the range of attenuation required in hifi volume control. Certainly interested in the email though.
     
    felix, Apr 6, 2006
    #5
  6. Dynamic Turtle

    anon_bb Honey Badger

    Joined:
    May 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,804
    Likes Received:
    0
    Its quite often done that way but it does introduce problems. Think about the noise floor as well.
     
    anon_bb, Apr 7, 2006
    #6
  7. Dynamic Turtle

    I-S Good Evening.... Infidel

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2003
    Messages:
    4,842
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    In a world of pain
    The best analogue volume control I know of, in terms of measured noise, linearity, balance, etc is on the left side of this picture:

    [​IMG]
     
    I-S, Apr 7, 2006
    #7
  8. Dynamic Turtle

    Dynamic Turtle The Bydo Destroyer

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    935
    Likes Received:
    0
    I take it that's the NAD silverline pre?
     
    Dynamic Turtle, Apr 7, 2006
    #8
  9. Dynamic Turtle

    I-S Good Evening.... Infidel

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2003
    Messages:
    4,842
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    In a world of pain
    No, it's the Master Series integrated (M3).
     
    I-S, Apr 7, 2006
    #9
  10. Dynamic Turtle

    SCIDB Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,501
    Likes Received:
    1
    Hi,

    Depending on what you want to spend. Have a look at the following. I have used these to good effect.

    http://www.dact.com/html/attenuators.html

    Also the Alps blue pots can be had for little money. If you buy in bulk and from the right supplier, they cost very little. Ideal for the mass production and keeping costs down.

    On the Hifi Collective site, are a number of options. The Panasonic pots are very good as well. But have a look at the Dale Vishay stepped attenuator as it is a good one.

    http://www.hificollective.co.uk/components/potentiometers.html

    Transformer volume controls are well worth a look. Can be a pain to put into an existing amp but you can get build a pre with them in. Or buy one. Here are two.

    http://www.diyhifisupply.com/diyhs_django.htm

    http://www.bentaudio.com/index2.html

    Audio Synthesis do a very good passive using vishay resistors.

    http://www.audiosynthesis.co.uk/passion_ultimate.htm

    SCIDB
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 8, 2006
    SCIDB, Apr 7, 2006
    #10
  11. Dynamic Turtle

    3DSonics away working hard on "it"

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Messages:
    1,469
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Planet Dirt, somewhere on it
    Hi,

    Music First Audio Passive Magnetic Preamp (abreviated PMP - pronounce as Pemp for fun) @ £ 1,500.

    BTW, NON of the currently commercially availabe switched attenuators are particulary good, simply because theya re all based on the arguably more economic and cheaper solution of using a sngle deck switch and daisychaining loads of resistors, rather tha using two decks and a pair of resistors per position (shunt attenuators are usually best avoided, for obvious resons).

    The best traditional attenuators I have made used GEC Pleesy NOS Type 72 Switches (currently still made by Blore Edwards but VERY expensive) and the dual resistor per position principle, using old Holco resistors and using a technique called "wire wrapping" where the actual contact and mechanical strength comes from wraping the wire (in our case the leadout from the resistor) around a stud (part of the single piece solid silver contact on those type 72 switches). Solder is only used to seal/fix the connection.

    These where better than than an all Vishay Audio Synthesis Passion (a shunt pot) and DACT's and anything else we tried, untill we hit the first transformer attenuator, that is.

    Ciao T
     
    3DSonics, Apr 7, 2006
    #11
  12. Dynamic Turtle

    anon_bb Honey Badger

    Joined:
    May 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,804
    Likes Received:
    0
    Any details for the GEC?

    What did you think of VFV? The vibe put me off to be honest.
     
    anon_bb, Apr 7, 2006
    #12
  13. Dynamic Turtle

    grivois

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2003
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The hexagone
    Bent Audio TAP

    I've just noticed that Bent Audio have a new remote controlled preamp that looks gorgeous:

    [​IMG]

    Thorsten, why is Colin using S&B TXs without cans?

    [​IMG]
     
    grivois, Apr 7, 2006
    #13
  14. Dynamic Turtle

    Dynamic Turtle The Bydo Destroyer

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    935
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yep, saw that new Bent Audio (very, very bad name for a company!) pre the other day. Looks pretty interesting. Fully loaded and with remote control too! God bless 'em!

    BTW - those Seiden steppers look pretty nice!

    DT
     
    Dynamic Turtle, Apr 7, 2006
    #14
  15. Dynamic Turtle

    bottleneck talks a load of rubbish

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,766
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    bucks
    DT I use the Dale/Vishay one in the link on SCIDB's site. It replaced an Alps blue pot, and sounds much better. Despite being of equal value to the Alps pot it 'sounded' a lot louder.

    Thorstens comments that non of the commercially available stepped attenuators are very good. Cobblers IMHO.
     
    bottleneck, Apr 7, 2006
    #15
  16. Dynamic Turtle

    Dynamic Turtle The Bydo Destroyer

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    935
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, my Pathos uses a Vishay stepper, and I'm very impressed with its performance (and the quietness/balance of the pre section, given that its tube based).

    Just wanted to know what quality of pot/stepper we should expect at different price levels, and its interesting that so many suggestions have come up! Wasn't aware there were so many alternatives to the ubiquitous ALPS unit :rolleyes:

    DT

    Thorsten just stepped in with his comments/suggestions and that's fine. I'm aware of his commercial activities and any potential bias that may (or may not) engender. AFAIK he is a "purist" audio engineer, and I fully expect him to be critical of anything less-than-perfect.
     
    Dynamic Turtle, Apr 7, 2006
    #16
  17. Dynamic Turtle

    bottleneck talks a load of rubbish

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,766
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    bucks
    I quite fancy the new audionote one on hificollective. Nick (of hifi coll) knows peter Q of Audionote, so I dont imagine seeing these things elsewhere. It would be cool to have the same vol control as a top audionote pre. I think mine is '50' and they only do '100' so I'm cream crackered (not that I want to change anyway..but..)
     
    bottleneck, Apr 7, 2006
    #17
  18. Dynamic Turtle

    Dynamic Turtle The Bydo Destroyer

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    935
    Likes Received:
    0
    Those AN pots do look quite interesting - cheaper than I thought they would be! Aren't AN pre's £10k+??

    DT
     
    Dynamic Turtle, Apr 7, 2006
    #18
  19. Dynamic Turtle

    3DSonics away working hard on "it"

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Messages:
    1,469
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Planet Dirt, somewhere on it
    Hi,

    Used to be sold at ham ralleys/vintage audio fairs by one of the smaller valve/parts vendors at around 25 quid the piece, long out of stock, new manufacture blore edwards last time I looked where around 270 quid, in the late 90's.

    Here is a piccie of one of the first attenuators I build using these switches....

    [​IMG]

    This one used a particular type of resistor Maplin carried a while back (again, long lost), which surprisingly where nonmagnetic and sounded very good.

    And no, please do not ask why one switch is back to front.....

    Sorry, I'm not tracking, somehow....

    Ciao T
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 8, 2006
    3DSonics, Apr 8, 2006
    #19
  20. Dynamic Turtle

    3DSonics away working hard on "it"

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Messages:
    1,469
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Planet Dirt, somewhere on it
    Hi,

    Not sure who Colin is (Bent Audio is John Chapman). The why? Maybe to fit the low profile.

    I prefer the cans, for limiting the hum pickup if suitable souces are nearby.

    Ciao T
     
    3DSonics, Apr 8, 2006
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.