BerylliumDust
WATCH OUT!!!
You are rigth Merlin... I definitely must stop buying those top shelf golden award issue magazines... even the 1062 got one...
merlin said:That's called a marketing budget over here![]()
merlin said:It's a good amp. beats anything up to £1000 IMO
merlin said:FWIW, I heard the most realistic portrayal of music in my memory this week, and the system had those old valves distorting, the record player with no doubt measurable in accuracies and speakers that physics dictate must distort at the levels those 8 watts were capable of![]()
BerylliumDust said:Be careful with you mouth then, ***** cat...
merlin said:Go on, I give up!
Is it an anagram?
michaelab said:BD - you should at least listen without prejudice. I'm back on the 11th and that weekend might be tricky but if you have some time between then and the new year I'll bring my DAC, preamp and power amp up to your place and you should have a listen.
michaelab said:You can even null test the preamp and the power amp if you like. I did some reading on the LC Audio site and since their modules use global feedback (from the output stage to before the integrator), they must have a short enough group delay to make a null test possible - it's something like 2 micro seconds I think, and anyway, isn't global feedback a good thing in your books?.
michaelab said:Anyway, what's wrong with the Rotel? I thought it was the 2nd best amp in the world after TD's amp?
Michael.
BerylliumDust said:The only thing wrong with the Rotel is the fact that it is not TD's amp... it is indeed the 2nd best amplifier that I know of...
BerylliumDust said:(...) If the one that measures better is the one that sounds worst, I have no choice but to change either my speakers or my CD player, providing that both measure better than the Rotel (...)