About a bit of a revelation last night... I have spent the large part of the last two weeks listening to music, bedding in and fine tuning my new speakers and set up in general so I was confident that I was familar with the sound and set up I now have. I recently ordered some very expensive cables froma well known supplier on a sale or return basis, they are a demo pair "burned in" and ready to go and cost around 400 quid for a 3 meter pair. My partner in hifi crime came over and we spent the evening "blind" testing them against my VDH CS122 at 10 quid a meter. Simple premise of guessing which cable was being used and using the same tracks both on CD and vinyl. Our results were no better than chance, in the 30 tunes we sampled we just couldn't reliably tell the difference. This could mean a number of things, We are both deaf Cables have little effect on the sound My system is pants and can't reveal the differences The new cables are no better than the ones I have and have a similar "sound" Now I reckon that it's point 2 but I'm sure that this view will be derided here as heresy. I would be interested in finding out how other people decide that a cable works, what should I look for and how can I be positive that A is better than B? Perhaps the gains are lost on me. I think I have used a very clean and accurate method so far but I have just not heard any improvement. I feel that I'm either missing out or that cables are more placebo than fact. I know this has been done to death but I hope we can have some objective views here without the crap these discussions have usually attracted in the past. TO BE ABSOLUTELY CLEAR I am not saying it doesn't work but rather that I couldn't tell. For the record the cables are Kimber and the system is capable, Xerxes/Lavardin/Audes. Finally I have gone from 100 quids worth to 400 quids worth should I be looking at spending even more to realise the gains that a better cable is suppsed to bring?