Dynamic Turtle
The Bydo Destroyer
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 935
- Reaction score
- 0
I only partially agree with this philosophy Paul, because:
a) True - we don't really have a choice if the transport is going to fail every 3-5 years. Send your cdx back to Naim and get a full service done while its there perhaps?
b) afaik, buffering DACs that are fed a poor signal (from a cheapo transport say) can only reduce jitter so much. e.g. they can re-clock a 1000ps signal to down 100ps, or say 100ps down to 10ps, but not 1000ps down to 10ps!!
The effectiveness of this method is questionable and I'm sure a lot of people at Naim would agree - especially after the (considerable) lengths they go to, in order to reduce jitter in their integrated players!
DT
a) True - we don't really have a choice if the transport is going to fail every 3-5 years. Send your cdx back to Naim and get a full service done while its there perhaps?
b) afaik, buffering DACs that are fed a poor signal (from a cheapo transport say) can only reduce jitter so much. e.g. they can re-clock a 1000ps signal to down 100ps, or say 100ps down to 10ps, but not 1000ps down to 10ps!!
The effectiveness of this method is questionable and I'm sure a lot of people at Naim would agree - especially after the (considerable) lengths they go to, in order to reduce jitter in their integrated players!
DT