Krell KAV 400xi integrated

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by michaelab, Dec 5, 2003.

  1. michaelab

    stumblin Kittens getting even...

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2003
    Messages:
    350
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    California!!!
    Of course. No-one said that integrateds have no drawbacks - as any engineer worth his salt will tell you, everything is a compromise.

    It's just that the advantages of a two box solution no longer out-weigh the one box solution. All in my humble opinion, of course.
     
    stumblin, Dec 17, 2003
    #21
  2. michaelab

    michaelab desafinado

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,403
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Lisbon, Portugal
    I'm an integrated supporter aswell. IMO the only advantage of a pre/power solution is one of flexibility and being able to change one part without having to change the other.

    stumblin's point about paying for "box" overheads twice is a good one as is the point about an extra set of cables in between them.

    It's a pity the myth about pre/power being inherently better still survives :rolleyes: Judge with your ears :)

    btw Doug, congrats on the mug-shot in this month's HiFi News getting your BADA award for "Best Industry Retailer Support Scheme" ;)

    Michael.
     
    michaelab, Dec 17, 2003
    #22
  3. michaelab

    ANOpax ESL-Meister

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Yorkshire & Scotland
    Not forgetting, of course, the extra set of buffer stages between pre-pwr to cope with impedance mismatches. Of course, integrateds dispense with the buffers so there are fewer components (and less cost!) in the signal path...

    I don't think that stumblin's point about greater component value in an integrated is particularly apposite. Equipment is sold on a fairly constant margin, and as a result, it's unlikely that a 4K amp will have 2K of parts if pre-pwr or 3K of parts if integrated. He's right though (and michael picked up on this) that some of that parts cost will be in elements which contribute less directly to the sound of the amp.

    reg
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 17, 2003
    ANOpax, Dec 17, 2003
    #23
  4. michaelab

    merlin

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Messages:
    3,262
    Likes Received:
    0
    Agreed, but with the correct attention paid, this need have no greater affect on the end result than using interconnects.
     
    merlin, Dec 17, 2003
    #24
  5. michaelab

    Robbo

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,371
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Berkshire, UK
    Another fan of integrated amps here (up to about £3K). I just like the simplicity factor, and if implemented well, there should not be any major performance penalties.

    Ultimately, above this level, pre/power amps are likely to be better, but I am not in the market for that level of amp.

    Gary, I strongly suspect that a SimAudio I-5 integrated at £2500 will comfortably see off similarly priced pre/powers from Salisbury. There is life outside Salisbury, honest!
     
    Robbo, Dec 17, 2003
    #25
  6. michaelab

    skp574

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Greenwich-sur-Thames
    Just picked up my KAV-400xi and Audio Research CD3. First impressions: wow, big improvement over my old Cyrus kit. Only been on for 6 or so hours so still running in, but this IS a good combination for my B&W805sigs. I like it very much!

    I will update this thread in due course if I get blown away even more.

    TTFN.
     
    skp574, Dec 23, 2003
    #26
  7. michaelab

    Robbo

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,371
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Berkshire, UK
    There should be big improvements over the next week or so as the kit burns in. sounds like you are in for a happy listening christmas:)

    Keep us posted

    Robbo
     
    Robbo, Dec 23, 2003
    #27
  8. michaelab

    skp574

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Greenwich-sur-Thames
    I sure hope so!

    Cheers and happy Chrimbo!
     
    skp574, Dec 23, 2003
    #28
  9. michaelab

    bottleneck talks a load of rubbish

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,766
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    bucks
    I think the pre-power ''is better'' arguement was more prevelant and more relevant before the recent trend for ''super integrateds'' began.

    The high end integrated is quite a new thing, from what I have seen and read - happy to be proved wrong here..

    I suppose traditionally an amp manufacturer would make integrated amps up to a set price point, and then make pre-powers above that. Like Naim for example.

    Im sure this must have contributed to a belief that after a certain price point integrated amps lose out to pre-powers... i.e. it was borne out by a manufacturers product range,which topped out with the pre/pows.

    I wonder which were the benchmark products that began the super integrated??? - Mark Levinson? Musical Fidelity? Im not sure...?
     
    bottleneck, Dec 23, 2003
    #29
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.