Mountain Bikes

Well, I picked up some of my new bits this morning (Ritchey crankset, FSA BB and Cane Creek headset), and hopefully my new forks should now be waiting for me at home. Now I just need some money to upgrade a few other things, but enough to build up the new bike now...
 
Isaac Sibson said:
Certainly the crank bros stuff seems to be the choice of the clip-in users. Me... I ride in too mad a fashion at times to use clip-ins...
Click to expand...
AFAIC, the only time you don't need clipless is if you're doing big jumps/stunts, or serious downhill...
I go down our local downhill (as seen on the last MBUK dvd!) with my Candy SLs with minimal grief... And if I fall off (which I often do :o ) they tend to come off as well - I went over the handlebars on Wednesday (again) with just a slight knee graze to show for it!
There's certainly no comparison when it comes to climbs, you just can't pump as hard with platforms - though they do take some getting used to..

Oh, and I used to be a Richey Megabites man... I never touched anything by Onza due to the dis-embowelling machine they used to market to stick on your handlebars :D
 
Perhaps a bad experience with a ski binding not releasing when it was meant to resulting in a broken leg would have something to do with my wariness of binding my feet to something like that... I don't deny that they're almost certainly better for pedalling efficiency, but they're not for me.
 
And after a weekend of various building tasks (and doing other things), it's almost ready:

newbike.jpg


Just need front brake bosses and a shock pump to finish putting it together.

Oh, and I need a new seatpost too.
 
They were always highly reviewed... and would probably be the ones I'd have if I did. I stripped out and rebuilt my pedals today; all of the old bits going on the new bike are getting a bloody good clean. Gave the back wheel a scrub (need to do the front), and there was black rubber embedded in the rim but I switched to the green pads many years ago. Oops...
 
They are indeed the ones, I have tried others but they are spot on and well worth their weight penaulty. Bikes looking good Isaac, its a similar fs geometry as my santacruz heckler which feels so right. I see what you mean about that seat post - too much suspension but would have been necessary on your old aluminium hardtale.
 
Isaac Sibson said:
Oh, and I need a new seatpost too.
Click to expand...
That looks like a sprung seatpost you have there. Do you find that interacts in odd ways with the rear suspension?

BTW, you have two nasty looking kinks in your frame there :lol:
 
Chris - having not yet ridden the FS (pedals went on last thing yesterday, and still no front brake...) I couldn't say. It's the seatpost out of my old HT (minus the shims). I think that the angle of the seat tube on the FS is such that it's going to put more sideways stress on the post than actually using the suspension of it, plus with the air shock it's not exactly necessary to have a sprung seatpost as well so can get something a lot lighter.

What got me about the geometry of the FS is that the bottom bracket is so high... it's about 14" off the floor! Still, at least the geometry of this frame is set up for this sort of fork (whereas my nail trail was rigid front end geometry with a 75mm fork), so things should work fairly well.

Something interesting I have discovered is that I can't have the horseshoe booster fitted on the back brake because as the suspension compresses it bangs into the seat tube. Unboosted maguras are generally a bad idea (flex, flex, SNAP) so I need to find some sort of lower profile booster.
 
It looks like a nice bike Isaac! I'm sure you'll get a lot of fun out of riding it, I bet you're looking forward to hammering down some of the bumpy stuff!

Are you getting rid of your hardtail then?
 
Chris - haven't decided yet... if someone wanted to offer me something for it I might well not refuse.
 
As for the unboosted maguras, shouldn't be as much an issue on the rear? as most of the big handfuls of stop are at the front wheel and it doesnt take much pressure to lock a back wheel.

I'm also on the lookout for a suitable bike rack, there are loads of trails between here and Manchester I have a great one that crosses saddleworth moor near the mast which could easily become the meeting/starting point and theres even a good pub en route although its just before a rather knarly DH.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's not as much of an issue, but the frame flexes disconcertingly and you get nothing like the modulation on the brake with that much flex... not as bad as Vs but still...

Send me details of that route as it's not far away...
 
Not Alu ones (hence why alu hard tails have a reputation for harsh ride) because of the fatigue properties of alu. In this case, if the frame flexes outward when the brake is applied, it's wasting some of the force which could be pushing the pads in onto the rim, plus the flex means that the lever will travel further and not offer as precise a modulation.
 
19.39lbs!
I thought mine was light at about 24...
My racer's 19lbs!
And I spose with that little weight you wouldn't miss the granny ring..
 
Imagine how little it would weigh if it were rigid... Mind you, aren't SID WC lighter than RC38s (although tbh I'd rather have the RC38s)? I barely use the granny ring as it is so the duo chainset would be rather nice...
 

Latest posts

Back
Top