Ohm's acoustic law and stuff

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by oedipus, Nov 20, 2004.

  1. oedipus

    michaelab desafinado

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,403
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Lisbon, Portugal
    Or perhaps this one from The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America -- April 1993 -- Volume 93, Issue 4, p. 2385, entitled Pitch, masking, and Ohm's law for hearing is more convincing?

    Michael.
     
    michaelab, Nov 25, 2004
    #61
  2. oedipus

    Graham C

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    680
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Leicestershire
    It is easy to demonstrate that if you alter the relative phase of more than 1 continuous unchanging signals [what the mathematician call periodic], you cant hear it. Presumably this is what Oedipus and Mr Ohm are wittering about. If it's a law, there is a good reason why it is fairly unknown - it's only partially relevant. Personally I agree with Michael that it is NOT a law since I can 'disprove' it in 3 sentences with no maths, which is why I questioned it.
     
    Graham C, Nov 25, 2004
    #62
  3. oedipus

    MartinC Trainee tea boy

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2003
    Messages:
    995
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southampton
    I know. If you look back you'll see the key point I was making is this:

    Obtaining spatial info. from ITD means we are sensitive to arrival time of sounds. Actually, more than that, that we are sensitive to the arrival time of specific parts of a cycle. This is not information from a power spectrum, whilst your initial assertion was that it was only the power spectrum that was relevant in terms of sound.
     
    MartinC, Nov 25, 2004
    #63
  4. oedipus

    MartinC Trainee tea boy

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2003
    Messages:
    995
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southampton
    The one place I'm left wondering if phase shifts might be relevant is over the leading edges of sounds, but if there's an issue here or not is going to depend on the time resolution of hearing which I'm not sure of.
     
    MartinC, Nov 25, 2004
    #64
  5. oedipus

    MarkS

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2003
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    You are right and I withdraw my comments.

    Apologies all round.

    Mark
     
    MarkS, Nov 25, 2004
    #65
  6. oedipus

    PeteH Natural Blue

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    931
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    South East
    Hmm. How accurately does the Tact system keep the amplitude constant while you're changing the time delay? Obviously if that's changing even by small amounts it could certainly be audible.

    I suppose in extremis the time delay must become audible at some stage - ie. if the bass sounded five seconds after the treble you'd certainly notice it - but I don't suppose the time delays you're talking about would be anything near what you'd need for that.

    Otherwise, it could be in your head :D
     
    PeteH, Nov 25, 2004
    #66
  7. oedipus

    merlin

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Messages:
    3,262
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good Point Pete. If in doubt blame the kit :D

    This forum is in grave danger of making any self respecting hifi lover slit their f*cking wrists at the moment!

    FFS, we have managed to prove that all Dacs sound the same, all amplifiers sound the same, positioning of drive units makes no difference, cables no difference, stands no difference, mains no difference. So what's left ?

    As a mountain biker, I take great pleasure in owning a Titanium bike that weighs all of 3lb less than your average Raleigh. Until someone proves to me that it isn't any quicker than anything else I will continue to get a real pleasure out of thinking I have bought the best and it has made me a better rider.

    It's called a hobby, something to take our minds off the monotony of everyday life. I fukcing hate scientists! What fukcing pleasure do they get out of life I ask myself? Shopping at Asda, driving a fukcing Vauxhall Astra, what a life!

    PS> I'm having a bad day :D
     
    merlin, Nov 25, 2004
    #67
  8. oedipus

    Robbo

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,371
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Berkshire, UK
    Dont worry Mike,

    To relieve the tedium, I'll put up a thread about tuning in the sub hopefully with some nice room EQ screenshots when I am fully au fait with it.

    mmmm....deeeep bass.
     
    Robbo, Nov 25, 2004
    #68
  9. oedipus

    MartinC Trainee tea boy

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2003
    Messages:
    995
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southampton
    :D . Young kids spend their time asking "Why?" lots, most people grow out of it but scientists don't ;) . Sorry.

    For my part I only ever post at work, so I'm distracted from the science I should be doing by discussions that are more interesting as they relate to my hobby. I assure you when I'm at home with my HiFi I don't have this problem!
     
    MartinC, Nov 25, 2004
    #69
  10. oedipus

    PeteH Natural Blue

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    931
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    South East
    Mainly pissnig on other people's parades. :D The scientific name for this process is 'peer review' BTW :)
     
    PeteH, Nov 25, 2004
    #70
  11. oedipus

    julian2002 Muper Soderator

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,094
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Bedfordshire
    not sure if it's what you're on about - my brain would shut down if i was forced to read most of this thread - but when i heard merlins tact / moon / crown / jbl / merlin system i played some gabba on it to see how it would cope. for some reason the tact was making the bass lag slightly and it was definately noticable (in comparison to my then system) of course the bass was much deeper but it was slightly behind the beat.

    robbo,
    do you have a new toy?
    cheers


    julian
     
    julian2002, Nov 25, 2004
    #71
  12. oedipus

    michaelab desafinado

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,403
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Lisbon, Portugal
    That's what I was going to ask... I thought you (Robbo) had done the sub thing before and decided it was better without?

    Michael.
     
    michaelab, Nov 25, 2004
    #72
  13. oedipus

    Robbo

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,371
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Berkshire, UK
    Robbo, Nov 25, 2004
    #73
  14. oedipus

    michaelab desafinado

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,403
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Lisbon, Portugal
    Cool - look forward to it.
    Michael.
     
    michaelab, Nov 25, 2004
    #74
  15. oedipus

    julian2002 Muper Soderator

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,094
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Bedfordshire
    did you get that where i think you got it?
    bet it sounds great. can;t wait to read the thread.
    cheers


    julian.
     
    julian2002, Nov 25, 2004
    #75
  16. oedipus

    merlin

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Messages:
    3,262
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bah your all the same :mad: And you can't spell to save your life!

    Robbo's new toy is one impressive beast - I believe my ceiling has the cracks to prove it :D

    If there's one thing we are learning on this forum it's that the only thing that's worth spending money on is your speakers. Big ones that go loud with virtually no distortion. Oh and EQ for the bottom end if possible ;)
     
    merlin, Nov 25, 2004
    #76
  17. oedipus

    wolfgang

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    814
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Scotland
    What we should be doing in this first place. Start paying attention to the music again rather then the toys. Having said that there are soooooo many things else we could still check out. Do all the recording techniques sound the same? More higher resolution discs are coming round the corner to bother our hifi nervosa.

    Many moons ago I did ponder whether titanium makes better mountain bike then steel. End up buying a steel one again since there was no local dealer around with one to try out. Once got that out of the way it is about the trails and mud. Rain and sun. What metal the bike is make of is no longer relevent.
     
    wolfgang, Nov 25, 2004
    #77
  18. oedipus

    PeteH Natural Blue

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    931
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    South East
    I think you mean "you're all the same". And the spelling was a mildly whimsical reference to your original deliberate misspelling, ie. a kind of proto-joke. :)
     
    PeteH, Nov 25, 2004
    #78
  19. oedipus

    julian2002 Muper Soderator

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,094
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Bedfordshire
    ahhhh bottom end eq is for pussys - let it all hang out i say.
    cheers


    julian
     
    julian2002, Nov 25, 2004
    #79
  20. oedipus

    merlin

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Messages:
    3,262
    Likes Received:
    0
    Go on Pete,

    tell us a scientist's joke that will make us all laugh!

    The biggest joke is probably ruining normal people's fun on internet forums. To be honest, I don't find that one overly amusing :mad:

    Wolfy,

    when your seat tube has rusted though and you are pondering what to replace your frame with, I'll still be pounding the trails without a care in the world :p
     
    merlin, Nov 25, 2004
    #80
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
There are no similar threads yet.
Loading...