Why no UK built NOS DAC?

Hi,

T-bone Sanchez said:
Hey T, do you reckon that 1545 DAC kit that Yeo's selling will sound okay?? In your opinion of course.

I have not heard it. I think an active I/V solution would be better.

I have a small battery powered DAC with TDA1545 & active I/V, non-OS and it sounds perfectly nice, much better (smoother, but with more detail - like Glenmorangie vs. Bells) than the TDA1543 stuff....

Ciao T
 
My Ack dAck! uses TDA1545A, battery power and active I/V. I think it sounds dandy, but it falls down on complex material I find.
 
3DSonics said:
Hi,



Philips CDM4Pro Swingarm IIRC and the player is called in the UK "Omega Drive"....



Ciao T

Does it come with a free CD?

B00000636B.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
 
3DSonics said:
I have a small battery powered DAC with TDA1545 & active I/V, non-OS and it sounds perfectly nice, much better (smoother, but with more detail - like Glenmorangie vs. Bells) than the TDA1543 stuff....
Why not offer it as a kit, like Crimson Elektrik used to do. Fully assembled and tested boards, DAC and PSU. Just build your own enclosure :)
 
technobear said:
Why not offer it as a kit, like Crimson Elektrik used to do. Fully assembled and tested boards, DAC and PSU. Just build your own enclosure :)

Would love to, but it is not my design... :) In fact, it is commercially available as 'Ack dAck!'. In short: I have an Ack dAck!
 
Hi,

technobear said:
Why not offer it as a kit, like Crimson Elektrik used to do. Fully assembled and tested boards, DAC and PSU. Just build your own enclosure :)

What for?

Diyparadise.com already has comparable offers anyway and my time is not worth the income.

As said before, learn to solder, take a piece of matrix board and solder in your own CS8412 & TDA1545 and the few additional components, total cost for what goes on the board around £ 10...15....

Ciao T
 
One downer about the Ack Dack is that it's battery powered. TBH I doubt the sonic benefits (if any) are worth the hassle of having to charge it etc. Amongst the many pages on the net about Non-OS dacs there's one guy who showed that a battery PSU can add its own issues and is not necessarily 'cleaner' than a decent mains driven PSU.

Michael.
 
michaelab said:
One downer about the Ack Dack is that it's battery powered. TBH I doubt the sonic benefits (if any) are worth the hassle of having to charge it etc. Amongst the many pages on the net about Non-OS dacs there's one guy who showed that a battery PSU can add its own issues and is not necessarily 'cleaner' than a decent mains driven PSU.

It's all about implementation... I don't care that much for the battery powered operations. You just turn it on when you want to listen and turn it off when you're done... I got at least 12 hours of play out of it (it can do even more).
 
Thorsten
3DSonics said:
Note that DAC's using Asyncronous Sample Rate Conversion (UpSampling, JitterBuster, ASRC et al) to "remove" jitter are not allowed for inclusion,
Does that include diyparadise.com's Monica 2 ?

Chris
 
Hi,

ChrisPa said:
Thorsten
Does that include diyparadise.com's Monica 2 ?

That uses asyncronous re-clocking. This instead of reducing jitter makes it sky-high (one sample period peak - that 22,700,000pS) but randomises it and changes the distribution with frequency. I find it a bit of taking potshots in the dark.

Ciao T
 

Latest posts

Back
Top