Lt Cdr Data
om
I wonder if stanton btw have anthing to do with pickering, some of their cartrigdes look strickingly similar.
Ant said:How about the Grado MI carts?
I'm keen to try one of these out.
3DSonics said:Hi,
Something that will make a lot of people laugh (and me grin when I remember how much money they wasted) a perfectly nice vinyl rig can be made using a Technics 1200/1210 (make sure it has not been abused though) with a Denon DL-103 bolted into the original Arm (which is VERY EASY to adjust) as it likes to be used in these old style non-rigid S Shape arms and not modern high rigidity arms for best sound.
It's funny you should mention the rigidity question.
I received this morning a Denon DL103 from Mantra Audio, my first moving coil cart.
I mounted it in the Nima unipivot arm atop my Roksan Radius 5 turntable using the soft screws and knurled round nuts supplied, flying in the face of everything I had learned from the mainstream hi-fi press.
As everyone is probably also aware, this arm has a plastic headshell, hardly what one would call the last word in rigidity.
However the sound that greeted my ears when I played the first record was simply gobsmacking!
I have never in 25 years of hi fi listening heard anything so beautiful!
The marriage of Nima arm and Denon DL103 is something very special.
Thanks for the insights everyone.
I have no experience of the standard 103 but Tony L has just changed from the 103 to the pro version - both have the same spherical tip - he seems to be more than happy.
kingsxfan said:Moving iron???
Go listen: be amazed.kingsxfan said:Moving iron???
TubeMan said:Bass is tighter but not as extended as the Stanton.
TubeMan said:Treble is clean, sweet and clear but somewhat lacking the nth degree of air.
TubeMan said:Top end was not as successful in my system. Although the treble was more extended it also brought with it an increase in the audibility of surface noise and a slight edge which had not been there before.
TubeMan said:Don't ask me how but increasing the mass of the arm had brought about improvements at both ends of the audible spectrum
That's fascinating and with (my) hindsight so obvious. For years I've struggled with unnaceptable (to my ears) distortion at the end of the groove, but not really questioned the widsom of traditional alignments. Hadn't really thought beofre that there's more vinyl available for the modulation at the beinning of the side in comparison to the end of the side.3DSonics said:As traditional alignements minimise only the average misalignemnt but often maximise the misalignment near the end of the record problems are unavoidable. Given that at least for classical material the climactic sections invariably fall into the inner groves the results can be very frustrating.
I have shifted to alignments that minmise misalignment in the inner groves (where we can least afford ANY misalignment) and trade of increased misalignment at the beginning of the record where not only the music is usually less demanding but also the actually size of the modulation is much larger for a given frequency and thus more misalignement is tolerable for a given frequency and amount of distortion.
What about the articles at TNT by Geoff Husband? Exposing the VTA myth?3DSonics said:True, but these would still be less than those you get from a misaligned (SRA) hypereeliptical stylus.
This Month HiFi+ contains some interesting tidbits on the sensitivity of extreme stylus shapes to SRA/VTA. It is in the section on the Demos they where running at the Manchester HiFi Show (mostly Mercury Living Presence record related). A few points of a degree off in SRA means for a hyper elliptical stylus the difference between "great" and "below average".
ChrisPa said:What about the articles at TNT by Geoff Husband? Exposing the VTA myth?