Cables

My point the mike's amp can output that low, but almost certainly the diaphragm inside the mike is unable to reproduce that frequency.

An alternative question. What is the point of Johnny?
 
lordsummit said:
My point the mike's amp can output that low, but almost certainly the diaphragm inside the mike is unable to reproduce that frequency.

An alternative question. What is the point of Johnny?

Yes if you followed the link , the specifications clearly states that.

If you knew Tim personally, and understood his philosophy, you wouldn't be making comments like that.

He does not compromise when it comes to designing equipment.

''Tim works by a simple premises: If he designs it, it must be a better design than anything else, or he will not manufacture it. His sole goal is taking audio to the furthest possible point of development.''

just like it says on his website.:)
 
Johnny you seem to only have come here for an argument. You only challenge others, you are avoiding people who challenge you. You seem to have an agenda here. I suspect you are a banned member returning under a different guise, we just haven't worked out which one yet. Stop trolling please it's getting very tedious.
 
Johnny said:
Yes if you followed the link , the specifications clearly states that.

If you knew Tim personally, and understood his philosophy, you wouldn't be making comments like that.

He does not compromise when it comes to designing equipment.

''Tim works by a simple premises: If he designs it, it must be a better design than anything else, or he will not manufacture it. His sole goal is taking audio to the furthest possible point of development.''

just like it says on his website.:)

LS's point (I think) was that my question related to the frequency response of microphones, not amplifiers. It was a straight question and I was looking for a straight answer. I play and record basses and am interested in advances in microphone design that might make that job easier.
 
No what I was saying was that the Microphone has an amplifier to send the signal to the recieving end, mixing desk etc, and that obviously is designed to be flat, no bumps and bulges on it's frequency output, what I was saying to Johnny was that just because a device can output at 3Hz, it doesn't mean that the mic will actually be responsive to that level. The Diaphragm of the mike probably can't respond to that level. You don't need to worry though, your Bass doesn't go down that low.
 
johnfromnorwich said:
LS's point (I think) was that my question related to the frequency response of microphones, not amplifiers. It was a straight question and I was looking for a straight answer. I play and record basses and am interested in advances in microphone design that might make that job easier.

hi,

Please forward your query to Tim and he will gladly give you a straight answer.

www.ear-yoshino.com/products.htm
 
penance said:
Why dont you give a straight answer to the people that have asked questions of you?


I simply don't have the patience to answer every question asked by every member.

Some of the questions also appear to be rhetorical :)
 
Johnny said:
Yes if you followed the link , the specifications clearly states that.

If you knew Tim personally, and understood his philosophy, you wouldn't be making comments like that.

He does not compromise when it comes to designing equipment.

''Tim works by a simple premises: If he designs it, it must be a better design than anything else, or he will not manufacture it. His sole goal is taking audio to the furthest possible point of development.''

just like it says on his website.:)

Johnny,

You come accross as very niave.

Most high end manufacturers believe that they make the best equipment.
 
I think we should call him "rubber johnny"

as he bounces from one question to another then from one stand point to another !

Well we will see which country he is based in anyway, he he, from his next answer !

Johnny perhaps I can remind you of the questions I've asked that you have ignored.



Why are you talking about speakers in a cable thread ?

By the way did Tim make that quote to you personally...you know the one about dangerous amateurs ? seems a little out of charactor to me as he is an inveterate tweaker himself.

what do you mean by "further argument will be futile so stop it "

And some from further back.....

where are your ideas comming from ?

what equipment are you using?

what cables are you currently using?

why wont you answer even the simplest question ?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top