Cables

3DSonics said:
Hi,



First, what debate, second, how dare you to try to force your style of debate on others unasked and unbidden...



Why? Please elaborate why there is a causal and direct link between performance and shielding? Why is a shielded cable inherently "better" than an unshielded one?

Please avoid commonplaces, assumptions and belief, present evidence.

L8er T
Click to expand...

because it can guard against electromagnetic waves which are essentially orthogonal vectors in R^3.

the admittance = d 1/u_ *1/v_*1/x_ /dx
V/ (L^2+R^2) = I/(R+i*xL ) where i= (-1)^1/2, xl is inductance.
Then the triple integral of f(x,y,z) dxdydz in R^3 by change of variables gives J(x_1...x_n) where J is Jacobian and f_1(x)...f_n(x) is the map (x,y)--> (x,y,z) in R^2.
 
zanash said:
There's no cable debate here on this thread......johnny is making statments, and has to date not answered a single request or given any information. A debate requires both parties to pass information.

So for the last time Johnny......

where are your ideas comming from ?
what equipment are you using?
what cables are you currently using?
why wont you answer even the simplest question ?
Click to expand...

I have used various types of monitors, mainly PMC monitors.
My ideas are not new, they are merely facts which one learns in basic high school physics.
 
That explains a lot ...as when I went to uni we were told to disregard all the physics we had learnt before.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought this thread was about cables (which do sound different :) )

But also notice you are all talking about bass frequency also.

As not many speakers go low anyway does what your saying matter ?
I myself am not a firm believer that you can get super low performance from small speakers due to room reinforcement.
 
Change your system not your cable

Johnny said:
I think it is appropriate to post this here :

Why do all you audiophiles spend so much money on cables ?

It's only a cable...I can't hear any difference..

Can you justify spending possibly hundreds or thousands of pounds on cables ?

Please explain this to me since, I don't understand ... :(



johnny
Click to expand...


There is a difference but not always an improvement. Does it justifies the cost or not? Most often it doesn't so beware.

If your looking to improve the sound try listening to a budget cable & an acknowledged reference cable. Improve the quality and resolution of your system enough & you cannot help but hear the difference. ;)
 
Johnny,

If I may put min my moneys worth ;I have the following obserevations (thoughts);

1) I replaced the standard interconnect (inexpensively) from my mission cdp with one advertised on the net and DID notice a differrence. I didin't substitute back again but I'm satified in my own mind there was a gain in resolution.

2) I totally agree with you - the science of the relationship of electricty and the cabled frustratingly evades me too. All web site explanations seem to dive straight fromthe relativly obvious to degree standard physics, which is oiver my head.
I would say the the new ic on the cdp is a rather more substantial affair than the mission item.

3) Hwo do you listen to music? It seems to me everyone has a different approach to it. My briother has just paid quite a lot for a new system which he (I beleive) listens to in the background whilst reading a book 0r mooching around the house. I take an hour to delibertely listen to an album closely. If you are the former you probable won't here the differences.

Don't know whether any of this is relavant to your intial query!





David
 
Sorry, I wrote the above to reply to thread concerning the validity of replacing cables/ ics. I'm not sure that it found the right place - if not please ignore!



D.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top