Thanks Michael,
What I'd probably do is pre-drill holes for 4 zap cards, try two first,
It strikes me it makes sense to pre-drill holes for mounts and connections for 4 zap modules, even if only initially going 2-channel. However this is only after reading your good notes.
Out of interest, what made you go for the rs 800VA as opposed to the 1000VA for only £5 more and just a bit taller?
Thinking about it paralleling the modules might be a bit of a pain for neatness, so 4 per psu is a sweet spot, although it would mean doubling the psu, xformer and iec costs.
One 4-ch amp can initially bi-amp the front mains, then once confidence and funds are available, a duplicate 4-ch could run the bi-amp trebles, starting with just one single module for running center, if it's such a leap from what I run now, as it sounds it might be.
e.g.
amp1:
Front left bass
Surr left
Surr right
Front right bass
amp2:
Front Center
Front left treble
Rear Center
Front right treble
This would ensure no psu interaction between the 1000VA for bass and 1000VA for treble with 2-channel music.
Hmm. 4-channels seems a strangely sensible number, although I'd probably plan one of the amps to become 5-channels to (passive) bi-amp the front center channel and to make it useable and re-saleable as a 5-channel 250wpc amp in it's own right.
I found this quite an interesting pwm history:
http://www.psaudio.com/articles/sdat.asp
Review of the ps audio 500Khz design:
http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/volume_9_2/ps-audio-hca-2-power-amplifier-6-2002.html
Also a stereotimes review of the Bel Canto eVo detailing class-T v.s. class-D
http://www.stereotimes.com/amp102300.shtm
Any thoughts appreciated.
regards,
Rob.