fadel art

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by amir, Jan 9, 2005.

  1. amir

    penance Arrogant Cock

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    6,004
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Bristol - armpit of the west.
    amir
    seeing as the output is AC, your assumption would seem to be incorrect about current flow.
     
    penance, Jan 12, 2005
    #21
  2. amir

    titian

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2003
    Messages:
    973
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Switzerland
    amir,
    never heard about that. :confused:
     
    titian, Jan 12, 2005
    #22
  3. amir

    amir

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2004
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    0
    ok penance, i know ac have no polarity but i wanted to describe my job
     
    amir, Jan 12, 2005
    #23
  4. amir

    penance Arrogant Cock

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    6,004
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Bristol - armpit of the west.
    But how can you say it goes to speaker thru one cable and returns in another if it is AC:confused:
     
    penance, Jan 12, 2005
    #24
  5. amir

    amir

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2004
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    0
    now i say current flow in positive direction from one cable and flow in negative direction from another cable
     
    amir, Jan 12, 2005
    #25
  6. amir

    penance Arrogant Cock

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    6,004
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Bristol - armpit of the west.
    Im still unsure, as it will alternate between cables, how does it show your cable to be at fault?
    Surely it could of been either.
    Im not saying you are wrong in wanting to change cables, just that i think your experiment would not prove it.
     
    penance, Jan 12, 2005
    #26
  7. amir

    amir

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2004
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    0
    in electromagnetic when two cables are beside them we have one capasitance between them and if these cables be far from each this capasitance reduce
     
    amir, Jan 12, 2005
    #27
  8. amir

    penance Arrogant Cock

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    6,004
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Bristol - armpit of the west.
    yes, and?
     
    penance, Jan 12, 2005
    #28
  9. amir

    amir

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2004
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    0
    with separating two cable we have no capacitance and energy flow more easily in cable
     
    amir, Jan 12, 2005
    #29
  10. amir

    penance Arrogant Cock

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    6,004
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Bristol - armpit of the west.
    But how does this show your cable to be at fault?
    Am i missing something here?
     
    penance, Jan 12, 2005
    #30
  11. amir

    amir

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2004
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    0
    this mean dielectric used in my cable for reducing electromagnetic fields is not good
     
    amir, Jan 12, 2005
    #31
  12. amir

    penance Arrogant Cock

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    6,004
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Bristol - armpit of the west.
    Or mayeb the other cable used?
     
    penance, Jan 12, 2005
    #32
  13. amir

    amir

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2004
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    0
    i confused penance
     
    amir, Jan 12, 2005
    #33
  14. amir

    penance Arrogant Cock

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    6,004
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Bristol - armpit of the west.
    so am i
     
    penance, Jan 12, 2005
    #34
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
Loading...