P penance Arrogant Cock Joined Jun 30, 2003 Messages 6,004 Reaction score 2 Location Bristol - armpit of the west. Jan 12, 2005 #21 amir seeing as the output is AC, your assumption would seem to be incorrect about current flow.
T titian Joined Jun 25, 2003 Messages 973 Reaction score 0 Location Switzerland Jan 12, 2005 #22 amir, never heard about that.
amir Joined Mar 19, 2004 Messages 345 Reaction score 0 Jan 12, 2005 #23 ok penance, i know ac have no polarity but i wanted to describe my job
P penance Arrogant Cock Joined Jun 30, 2003 Messages 6,004 Reaction score 2 Location Bristol - armpit of the west. Jan 12, 2005 #24 But how can you say it goes to speaker thru one cable and returns in another if it is AC
amir Joined Mar 19, 2004 Messages 345 Reaction score 0 Jan 12, 2005 #25 now i say current flow in positive direction from one cable and flow in negative direction from another cable
now i say current flow in positive direction from one cable and flow in negative direction from another cable
P penance Arrogant Cock Joined Jun 30, 2003 Messages 6,004 Reaction score 2 Location Bristol - armpit of the west. Jan 12, 2005 #26 Im still unsure, as it will alternate between cables, how does it show your cable to be at fault? Surely it could of been either. Im not saying you are wrong in wanting to change cables, just that i think your experiment would not prove it.
Im still unsure, as it will alternate between cables, how does it show your cable to be at fault? Surely it could of been either. Im not saying you are wrong in wanting to change cables, just that i think your experiment would not prove it.
amir Joined Mar 19, 2004 Messages 345 Reaction score 0 Jan 12, 2005 #27 in electromagnetic when two cables are beside them we have one capasitance between them and if these cables be far from each this capasitance reduce
in electromagnetic when two cables are beside them we have one capasitance between them and if these cables be far from each this capasitance reduce
P penance Arrogant Cock Joined Jun 30, 2003 Messages 6,004 Reaction score 2 Location Bristol - armpit of the west. Jan 12, 2005 #28 yes, and?
amir Joined Mar 19, 2004 Messages 345 Reaction score 0 Jan 12, 2005 #29 with separating two cable we have no capacitance and energy flow more easily in cable
P penance Arrogant Cock Joined Jun 30, 2003 Messages 6,004 Reaction score 2 Location Bristol - armpit of the west. Jan 12, 2005 #30 But how does this show your cable to be at fault? Am i missing something here?
amir Joined Mar 19, 2004 Messages 345 Reaction score 0 Jan 12, 2005 #31 this mean dielectric used in my cable for reducing electromagnetic fields is not good
P penance Arrogant Cock Joined Jun 30, 2003 Messages 6,004 Reaction score 2 Location Bristol - armpit of the west. Jan 12, 2005 #32 Or mayeb the other cable used?
P penance Arrogant Cock Joined Jun 30, 2003 Messages 6,004 Reaction score 2 Location Bristol - armpit of the west. Jan 12, 2005 #34 so am i