50mm materials do not have as wide a range of absorption as 100mm, the peak frequencies may be similar, but 50mm fiberglass we use has far less aborption at 125hz and 100mm at 125hz, 50mm is around 0.2 whilst 100mm is around 0.7
Fiberglass and foams also behave differently, 2" fiberglass has a far smoother plot than foam of the same relative depth, starting at 0.2 @100hz for 50mm fg against 0.1for 50mm melamine, 250hz gives 0.8 with fg against 0.5 from melamine, you get the idea
i have lots of graphs and figures if anyone is interested.
Spacing materials away from the boundary surface is a cost effective way of improving absorption range
Fiberglass and foams also behave differently, 2" fiberglass has a far smoother plot than foam of the same relative depth, starting at 0.2 @100hz for 50mm fg against 0.1for 50mm melamine, 250hz gives 0.8 with fg against 0.5 from melamine, you get the idea
i have lots of graphs and figures if anyone is interested.
Spacing materials away from the boundary surface is a cost effective way of improving absorption range