- Joined
- Jun 19, 2003
- Messages
- 873
- Reaction score
- 0
Originally posted by lAmBoY
But this slim device doesnt have a RAID box of 256 Seagate FC drives! Thus I propose that it is useless![]()


Buy the Imerge and spend a fortune

Originally posted by lAmBoY
But this slim device doesnt have a RAID box of 256 Seagate FC drives! Thus I propose that it is useless![]()
Originally posted by PBirkett
One mans shit is another mans bread and butter, as they say![]()
Originally posted by technobear
I have a wireless keyboard and mouse that operate in the 2.4 GHz region and they are regularly swamped by 'something' locally. There are 14 channels to choose from and I have tried them all. I should have a range of 5m but right now I'm having to stay as close as 1m for it to work reliably. This is the second wireless keyboard and mouse that I have had. The previous set, from a different manufacturer, was just as bad. Right now I don't have a very high opinion of wireless links and won't be wasting my money on wireless LAN technology.
Originally posted by PBirkett
Apparently, the bluetooth technology allows for far more responsive wireless links for keyboards and mice.
Originally posted by Sgt Rock
the Squeeze box will connect to any PC using any disc drive/RAID array
Buy the Imerge and spend a fortune![]()
Originally posted by lAmBoY
....and have a dedicated audio server that doesnt double up as Quake3/excel/word workhorse. (IME when the PC is used for other 'duties' then playback is compromised ie stutter and pauses due to the system unanble to keep up with the stream.)
But its all horses for courses, if you use your PC and it works OK, then both machines are doing an identical job.
Originally posted by merlin
but surely Paul, if his kit is currently working at 2.4ghz, then it IS Bluetooth![]()
Overclockers Australia said
If you are looking for one of the fastest and most accurate wireless keyboard/mouse combinations available, the Microsoft Wireless Optical Desktop for Bluetooth is the way to go. The superior signal refresh rate Bluetooth provides gives exceptional performance for those looking to free themselves of wires, yet don't want to sacrifice ease of use and quality. The Bluetooth technology also provides additional functionality and value for money, in that it is compatible with other Bluetooth compatible
devices. The Microsoft Optical Desktop for Bluetooth also oozes class with its futuristic and stylish good looks. As with previous wireless products I have reviewed, I recommend that if purchasing this product, also invest in some high quality rechargeable AA batteries - they'll save you a lot of time and money in the end. (Although in the five days I have been using the desktop, the batteries have maintained excellent power. I couldn't tell you how long they last for, because I was unable to flatten them during the course of my usage and testing.
The Microsoft Wireless Optical Desktop for Bluetooth retails for RRP AUD $399. Pretty high up there, but in comparison to the price you would pay for a wireless desktop package with a slow radio refresh rate, you can see the price is somewhat justified in features and new technology.
Originally posted by Markus Sauer
Most importantly, the user interfaces on PCs are crap: none competes with a stand-alone player for ease of use. I think we'll see CD player emulations on touch screens, which will allow using the PC as intuitively as a CD player. Using a cursor is a furking nuisance with those goddamn touchpads.
Personally I'd like an ethernet external hard drive. Iomega makes one but a European version is not available yetOriginally posted by julian2002
i have an old 400 mhz pentium 2 in my garage that i'm going to try to turn into a media server. i've also got an old external 20gb hard drive which i'm going to incorporate into it to start me off. all i need now is a wireless router and my new laptop which has been arriving 'any day now' for the past 1.5 months ...
Hmmm. Well not my microwave as it plays up at times when I'm not cooking. And my phone is DECT. I don't have any other wireless devices except my mobile phone and it still plays up when that is switched off. It's infuriating. It does get better if I stay close to the receiver but that doesn't suit the layout I wanted to achieve. I bought this keyboard because it was the only one that claimed a decent range (5m). It does work at 5m but only when the interference is not occurring. It's not 24 hours a day. It's not even every day which leads me to believe that it may be something one of my neighbours is using. Whatever it is, it must be pretty strong as I live in a brick built detached house although I suppose the signal could be coming straight through the living room windows.Originally posted by Sgt Rock
It could be a microwave or a non DECT cordless phone.
Err, no. Bluetooth, Wifi and my keyboard all work in the 2.4 GHz region of the spectrum but they are all different and in theory they should not interfere with one another (yeah rightOriginally posted by merlin
but surely Paul, if his kit is currently working at 2.4ghz, then it IS Bluetooth![]()
So there goes the idea of having a terabyte music server in the loft and a low power diskless silent PC connected to the DAC64 in the living roomOriginally posted by merlin
Just to clarify, Bluetooth technology is based on radio transmission at 2.4ghz . Whilst it is wireless, it tends to only function over very short distances (marketing hype is crap) and has serious issues with walls!
Originally posted by technobear
So there goes the idea of having a terabyte music server in the loft and a low power diskless silent PC connected to the DAC64 in the living room![]()
Originally posted by lAmBoY
you dont need SCSI for such a device. u can go with a SATA RAID box, much cheaper and does the same job.
Tell me about it! My MESH PC is getting the Zalman Flower treatment on FridayOriginally posted by lAmBoY
Fans are the bane of consumer electronics.