Magazines Eh?

[auric]

i buy hi-fi plush just for the smell mmmmmm.

As for me, I enjoy Hi-Fi+ most these days - nice smell, good paper, well presented.

I must agree with Julian and 7_V on this one it works for me. I tend to purchase Hi-Fi+ and Hi-Fi and as my newsagent has all mags in the shop on sale or return I have a good few to browse and buy if I like the pictures.

Auric

 

[The Devil]

Hi 7V

So, Hi-Fi gamma minus are reviewing your speakers, eh? As long as you haven't 'striven for accuracy' in their design, you might get a meaningless drivvelly review. Here's hoping.....

 

[wadia-miester]

I take they are not 'Too Keen' on mana then James ?

 

[7_V]

Originally posted by The Devil
So, Hi-Fi gamma minus are reviewing your speakers, eh? As long as you haven't 'striven for accuracy' in their design, you might get a meaningless drivvelly review. Here's hoping.....

Thanks (I think).

 

[auric]

Softening of markets

Will the net hi-fi mags casue the high street hi-fi mags to meet the same fate as this artical would seem to suggest Porn Mag Sales Going Limp?

Auric

 

[michaelab]

I doubt it auric. Net porn can offer so much (for so little) that you could never get in a static medium like a magazine.

I can't see net HiFi mags being any more than HTML versions of a print magazine. Apart from being marginally more interactive and more up to date I don't really see them being fundamentally any different to paper mags.

Michael.