mick parry said:
The problem is that smokers are addicted and find it unpleasant not to smoke.
Addiction means that your needs overcome good sense and behaviour.
The only way to stop them smoking in public is by legislation backed up by heavy punishment.
And who continues to KEEP allowing people to become addicted in the first place? The government. They KNOW cigarettes kill and are addictive, yet they don't ban THEM - only smoking. Typical wimpout clause. As I've said before, the government care about MONEY, not YOU.
If they ban smoking, they should ban alcohol as well - that kills as many people and causes fighting, public disturbances, and puke puddles everywhere. How'd you like your malts being banned?
As for cars, no, they don't fill buildings full of noxious fumes - at least, not in the same way. But you walk onto Heavitree Fore Street here in Exeter - you can't smell the stink per se, but you can't breathe.
As far as I'm concerned, taking in gobfulls of car fumes is every bit as bad as taking in passive smoke, and I have no control over that. So ban cars and smoking and make it fair on everyone. Oh yeah - of course, that's a stupid attitude - we can't stop fat obese people driving 200 metres to the shops, kicking out tonnes of crap because their engines aren't warm, but we can stop 1 person having a fag in a train station. I don't see the difference personally.
And yeah, most bar staff *I* know or see smoke as well, so "duty of care" is in the main, b***ocks.
Oddly enough though, *I* also support the idea of a smoking ban, so long as, as I said before, the smokers have at least one or two venues in a town to use to smoke. If you want to be a health freak, don't drink either - we'll see how boring the non-smoking pubs get won't we?
EDITED TO ADD:
Oh - and here's the OTHER thing; smokers might be in the minority now, but many of them are young people, who, err, don't currently vote (based on what I heard re the last General Election). Now, you get a smoker about to lose their right to smoke, and they WILL get up and take action. My supposition is this - if you're young, 18, you'll be highly likely to be a smoker, based on what I see around town - BUT NOT HIGHLY LIKELY TO VOTE - how many 18 year olds can be arsed to vote? RIght - so all the smokers vote for the party that ISN'T trying to ban smoking, and they might just get in - ever thought of that one???