3DSonics
away working hard on "it"
Hi,
This is unlikely to have much effect. The circuit uses negative feedback to set it's closed loop gain of around 20db (or so) and two stages in series are used inside the feedback loop (in fact, there is additional positive feedback in the second stage to maximise open loop gain) so even the 12AU7 will have with both sections in series an open loop gain of approximatly 20 * 20 (12AU7 Mu = 20), so an open loop gaon of around 400 for a closed loop gain of 10 vs the open loop gain of 10000 (appx.) when using the 12AX7 - changing the valves will make no appreciable difference to the closed loop gain aseven the lowest gain valve has loads more gain open loop than with the feedback loop closed.
Which again will make little impact in this amplifier circuit, if any.
That was already if you look closely and the results where not liked much according to T-Bone.
So, while you input may be generically relevant (not always though), it is completely off base here.
Ciao T
raindance said:Sorry to butt in here, what about trying different valve types with lower gain? Looking at the circuit you could decrease gain by replacing the 12AX7 (mu=100) with a 12AT7 (mu=70) or even 12AY7 (mu=44) OR another 12AU7 (mu=17 or so).
This is unlikely to have much effect. The circuit uses negative feedback to set it's closed loop gain of around 20db (or so) and two stages in series are used inside the feedback loop (in fact, there is additional positive feedback in the second stage to maximise open loop gain) so even the 12AU7 will have with both sections in series an open loop gain of approximatly 20 * 20 (12AU7 Mu = 20), so an open loop gaon of around 400 for a closed loop gain of 10 vs the open loop gain of 10000 (appx.) when using the 12AX7 - changing the valves will make no appreciable difference to the closed loop gain aseven the lowest gain valve has loads more gain open loop than with the feedback loop closed.
raindance said:Also, removing cathode bypass caps will decrease gain, but increase local negative feedback.
Which again will make little impact in this amplifier circuit, if any.
raindance said:What the heck, while I'm here another solution is to pad down the INPUT of the power amplifier...
That was already if you look closely and the results where not liked much according to T-Bone.
So, while you input may be generically relevant (not always though), it is completely off base here.
Ciao T