the great pay back time

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by nando, Apr 22, 2009.

  1. nando

    shrink

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,255
    Likes Received:
    0
    This whole trade a car in for £2000 nonsense really makes my blood boil. Once again the pillocks in charge have completely missed the point.

    I have an 8 year old Nissan 2.0 16v primera, and at the moment im averaging 41.4mpg over the last tank of fairly mixed driving. It runs well, doesnt cause me any bother. It stands to reason a 10 year old example of the same car would do much the same.

    So what they are proposing, is that i turn in my nice 40mpg car, cause more waste and energy loss in scrapping a perfectly good car, and replace it with a modern car that will give me about 40mpg?

    if they did their sums they would realise that the creation of one single new car, causes more harm to the environment than if i drove my car for another 50 years.

    What they should be doing is the exact bloody opposite of what they are doing. they should be actively encouraging people TO drive old cars, with incentives and cost benefits for those willing to run, and look after older cars. Get car manufacturers to stop making so many bloody new cars, that just sit in huge giant aircraft hangers in luton, because no one is buying them.

    Once again, they get it completely arse about face, and the tax payer will pick up the bill for it.

    Don't even get me started on the budget, and the need to add yet more duty to the cost of petrol, its nothing but sheer unadultarated greed, and it punished those of us (like me) who simply cannot exist without a car. I don't live anywhere near any public transport, and in order to get to work each day i rely on my car, which every year that goes past, costs me more and more to do so.

    perhaps if they need to raise a few extra quid, they can stop dipping their hands into the pockets of public money to pay for pornography, second homes, new kitchens and paying their sons neighbours dogs to lick envelopes for them.

    Tossers!!

    Heres a few radical ideas (and im about to make some enemies here i suspect)

    1) charge obese people more national insurance, to put towards health costs, as obesity is an enormous drain on the NHS... if your considered obese, lose weight or pay up.

    2) make cigarettes so obscenely expensive that people either have to give up, or if they can afford to pay for them, it will cover the additional health costs that once again, smokers put onto the NHS.

    3) making booze more expensive is at least one half intelligent idea they have. Its a leisure product, by no means necessary, and if people want to get drunk, make it cost them the earth.

    just a few ideas that wont win me any popularity contest amonst the overweight, bar frequenting smokers amongst us. But it would certainly free up a few billion pounds a year thats spent on healthcare for all of the above groups. but knowing out government, they will just use it to bail out some other company that should frankly have been able to save itself.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 24, 2009
    shrink, Apr 24, 2009
    #41
  2. nando

    amazingtrade Mad Madchestoh fan

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Manchester
    Shrink by putting the taxes on booze and fags too high you just create a problem with the black market. I am very anti smoking but I don't agree with putting too high taxes on it because people will just import more ilegal fags and that makes things worse.

    As for booze we already pay about 200% tax on it or something stupid it is a leasure product but any government that makes it very pricey will loose a lot of votes.

    The rest of it I agree with. Not so sure again about obsesity as this is also genetic it is not just about food.
     
    amazingtrade, Apr 24, 2009
    #42
  3. nando

    spica

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2008
    Messages:
    310
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    isotropic
    spica, Apr 24, 2009
    #43
  4. nando

    DavidF

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    Messages:
    3,296
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Shropshire
    Yes, but 95% of the issue in this country IS about food ....and nothing to do with genetics.

    Around here, I just have to walk to my post office 200 yards away to see the efects. I'm carrying about a stone I'd like to shed, but there is no necessity for the bouncy ball shaped specimens that walk into my local post office.

    Agreed on the car bits above but not really booze. You don't have to be an alcoholic to appreciate a pint now and then.

    Then again I'm happy to see fags hammered. A colleague at work is having chemo this year. I don't want to sound unsympathetuic but her 20/day habit .........??





    (btw at the last xmas party I did notice that I came home WITHOUT clothers smelling of s**t)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 24, 2009
    DavidF, Apr 24, 2009
    #44
  5. nando

    RobHolt Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Messages:
    4,126
    Likes Received:
    9
    You appear to have an incredibly selective view of history if you think that the Tories would not have led the country into exactly the same position. Worse in fact, as we'd have the current degree of economic shit plus higher unemployment and worse public services.

    You get what you ask for.

    If people want popular capitalism they get the good, the bad and the ugly. Some of us remember the rioting on the street as a result of Tory monetarism, destroyed communities, interest rayes at 18% with record repossessions.... the list of destruction and failure is as long as you want it be.

    The truth is that most have benefitted financially over the past 12 years due to the longest sustained period of consecutive growth on record. Top economists loved Blair/Brown because they delivered exactly what they wanted.

    And now it is all crashing down and the party is over for this cycle - exactly as it should and it really shouldn't be that much of a surprise. But please don't delude yourself that any other bunch of politicians, playing the same game by the same rules would do any better.


     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 24, 2009
    RobHolt, Apr 24, 2009
    #45
  6. nando

    Seeker_UK

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not entirely true.

    Whilst any party at the helm during the current crisis would be suffering the same problems, I do not believe that they would have taken the "Carol Vorderman" option and put the UK in hock for 23 years.


    But most politicians today are all the same, and dangerous for the country. Most MPs (all parties) are career politicians, in Parliament because they like all the fun and games of the "Westminster Village", rather than actually being there through a desire to do better for their country and their constituency. It's that sort of attitude that generates a sense of superiority, removes ideals and dogma and gives us the sense of one amorphous entity in charge and not 2 sides fighting for what's right.

    What also does not help is that the current govt focus on getting in power and staying in power often to the exclusion of doing the right thing.





    “...It is high time for me to put an end to your sitting in this place, which you have dishonoured by your contempt of all virtue, and defiled by your practice of every vice; ye are a factious crew, and enemies to all good government; ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would like Esau sell your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas betray your God for a few pieces of money.

    “Is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you? Is there one vice you do not possess? Ye have no more religion than my horse; gold is your God; which of you have not barter'd your conscience for bribes? Is there a man amongst you that has the least care for the good of the Commonwealth?

    “Ye sordid prostitutes, have you not defil'd this sacred place, and turn'd the Lord's temple into a den of thieves by your immoral principles and wicked practices? Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation; you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redress'd; your country therefore calls upon me to cleanse the Augean Stable, by putting a final period to your iniquitous proceedings, and which by God's help and the strength He has given me, I now come to do.

    “I command ye, therefore, upon the peril of your lives, to depart immediately out of this place! Take away that shining bauble there, and lock up the doors. You have sat here too long for the good you do. In the name of God, go!â€Â
     
    Seeker_UK, Apr 24, 2009
    #46
  7. nando

    RobHolt Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Messages:
    4,126
    Likes Received:
    9
    That might be the case - we could be in marginally less debt though a huge proportion of it results from propping-up the banking system, and none of the main parties would have let the financial system sink.
     
    RobHolt, Apr 24, 2009
    #47
  8. nando

    nando nando

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,017
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    london
    no-so daft-

    AFTER ALL IT HAS ALERTED YOU ALL, , nice to talk, meerkat.com.
     
    nando, Apr 25, 2009
    #48
  9. nando

    Samantha

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nope - stand by my "daft post" comment. Still stands IMO.

    Plus you have added another ...... I doubt any of the intelligent contributors (from both sides of the fence) required 'alerting'.

    Go on, make it a hat trick? ;)
     
    Samantha, Apr 27, 2009
    #49
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
Loading...