Turntables & vinyl: just a fashion thing or a sincere appreciation for the sound?

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by Lawrie, Feb 2, 2004.

  1. Lawrie

    ReJoyce ... Jason Hector that is.

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: Aro

    Exactly right. I never play a CD after a record has gone on, it just sounds so flat after the record. Start with CD then upgrade to the decent source once the system has warmed up ;->

    Cheers

    Jason
     
    ReJoyce, Feb 4, 2004
    #41
  2. Lawrie

    timpy Snake Oil free!!!

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    441
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Not in my experience either, even using the best in the way of cables etc. ;) . Tis true the basic character remains, and I could tell that it was my Avalon playing, but the copy had a slight hardness which wasn't in the original. A couple of people thought that this made it sound better than the original (searper with better focus), which was fine, until it got to the stringed instruments, which were just strident.

    Cheers
     
    timpy, Feb 4, 2004
    #42
  3. Lawrie

    The Devil IHTFP

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Messages:
    4,613
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Disco Towers
    Hi Jason,

    Yes, it does take a bit of self-discipline to resist putting on a record, but I've got a lot of good music on CD too, and it seems a shame to never play it.

    It's very difficult to describe the difference between the two media, but vinyl just tends to sound more 'natural', if that makes sense. In fairness, however, there is some grotty vinyl about as well.
     
    The Devil, Feb 4, 2004
    #43
  4. Lawrie

    juboy

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2003
    Messages:
    173
    Likes Received:
    0
    Your wish is my command ;)
     
    juboy, Feb 4, 2004
    #44
  5. Lawrie

    tones compulsive cantater

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    3,021
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Switzerland
    Re: Aro

    Interesting - a phenomenon from which I've never suffered. Y'all have my sympathies.
     
    tones, Feb 4, 2004
    #45
  6. Lawrie

    RDD Longterm Lurker

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2003
    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Re: Re: Aro

    Me neither, sorry chaps but as much as I like vinyl, this "night and day" quality difference between CD and vinyl....I've never heard it....

    My sympathies also.
     
    RDD, Feb 4, 2004
    #46
  7. Lawrie

    notaclue

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    0
    Personally, I found that cartridges have a big influence on 'vinyl sound' and the ones I tried sounded all pretty different to me.

    But as I have had a level/volume control on the two CD players I have owned, it was possible to match the level roughly with my turntable and switch between the two (using remote control source switching on amp). Some records/CDs that I have duplicates of (notably non-digitally remastered Warner Bros/WEA stuff, Neil Young, Joni Mitchell, Tim Buckley etc.) sound very similar, provided I used a Goldring 1042 cartridge which sounded the closest to CD.

    Incidentally, I also found by doing this that my turntable (Linn Axis) was running a bit fast but it is possible to alter the speed of the Axis by turning a small screw-thingy in the base. Of course, I realised when I first tried comparing the two that the speed difference meant that the Axis was running slightly too fast not that it had better 'PRaT' (dontcha just hate that term?) or was more 'tuneful' or whatever!
     
    notaclue, Feb 4, 2004
    #47
  8. Lawrie

    badchamp Thermionic Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    680
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NW London
    We used a have a very small collection of albums (I was into singles in quite a big way) stored on a kind of "flip over" stand in the lounge whereby the front cover of the top album was always in view.

    I always used to put my copy of Never Mind..... at the front :JOEL: but mysteriously whenever I went back in it was always at the back :D
     
    badchamp, Feb 4, 2004
    #48
  9. Lawrie

    tones compulsive cantater

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    3,021
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Switzerland
    Re: Re: Re: Aro

    No longer alone! I've always dreamt of this day...
     
    tones, Feb 4, 2004
    #49
  10. Lawrie

    Paul Duerden

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2003
    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Lancaster UK
    Excellent point Fox,

    The music is always. more important than the format.
     
    Paul Duerden, Feb 4, 2004
    #50
  11. Lawrie

    merlin

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Messages:
    3,262
    Likes Received:
    0
    In which case Paul, can you explain to me why you don't listen to it on a good discman, in the car or on an old midi system?
     
    merlin, Feb 4, 2004
    #51
  12. Lawrie

    The Devil IHTFP

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Messages:
    4,613
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Disco Towers
    Paul

    Not if you are a hi-fi nerd like me (and everyone else here). We all bought music before we got our silly hi-fis.

    Excellent news today.
     
    The Devil, Feb 4, 2004
    #52
  13. Lawrie

    notaclue

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    0
    While we're at it...

    Let's dispel the silly myth that hi-fi is 'about the music'. It isn't. It's about the sound quality.
     
    notaclue, Feb 4, 2004
    #53
  14. Lawrie

    cookiemonster

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Berkshire
    Its all about the music :lol: :lol: :redrum:
     
    cookiemonster, Feb 4, 2004
    #54
  15. Lawrie

    notaclue

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    0
    Tisn't, tisn't, tisn't, tisn't! :mad:
     
    notaclue, Feb 4, 2004
    #55
  16. Lawrie

    cookiemonster

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Berkshire
    You're right of course :)

    I was just saying it, 'cos i can get away with it :p
     
    cookiemonster, Feb 4, 2004
    #56
  17. Lawrie

    Paul Duerden

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2003
    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Lancaster UK
    Hi Merlin,

    I do a lot of listening at night to a Sony radio and headphones, Late Junction being a favourite.

    Nothing wrong with listening to a great system of course as long as we bear in mind that it is just a means to an end. If an old favourite comes up on a pub jukebox I always really enjoy it, somehow the pub system doesn't get in the way. I have the same experience in record shops sometimes, perhaps I am at the first faltering steps of a cure to all this Hi Fi.

    I bet there are a few relapses to come on the way though.
     
    Paul Duerden, Feb 4, 2004
    #57
  18. Lawrie

    The Devil IHTFP

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Messages:
    4,613
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Disco Towers
    No, and I never said it! The differences are fairly subtle, but having said that, easily appreciated.
     
    The Devil, Feb 4, 2004
    #58
  19. Lawrie

    Alex S User

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2003
    Messages:
    588
    Likes Received:
    0
    Music goes in your ears and the brain decides if you like it. I'm actually much more fussy about music I hear on a mini-system - my brain has to work that much harder. I like almost anything on a good system - Is that good? Anyway, unlike bub and Jason I'm no longer a format snob.
     
    Alex S, Feb 4, 2004
    #59
  20. Lawrie

    Uncle Ants In Recordeo Speramus

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,928
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    East Midlands
    Re: Re: Re: Aro

    It depends what you mean by quality difference. If you mean that "CD is way better than vinyl" or "vinyl is way better than CD" then yes, that kind of difference doesn't exist. That there IS a difference in the quality ie. the nature and character of the sound produced from each format for a given recording, is highly likely and born out by personal experience. Which is preferred is largely going to be down to personal taste.

    Its a far more complex issue than most people are prepared to admit. The hifi mags for years assumed CD sound quality was superior to vinyl and now the current orthodoxy seems to be that vinyl is superior. Its posited by the press in black and white terms and the world ain't like that.

    Its not as though you can even do a proper AB comparison. Even if you had a copy of the same album on CD and vinyl, if you ABed you wouldn't be able to tell whether the differences were down to

    a)differences in the character of the playback equipment

    b)differences introduced at the (re)mastering stage, or various other stages in the process of taking a recording to a final product. including the possibility of having a good or bad vinyl pressing.

    c)what is left after these differences are considered which is the genine difference between the two ie. the intrinsic difference in character between the two mediums.

    Who knows? All I can tell you is that I have some records on both vinyl and CD and often (but not always) I prefer the sound of my particular vinyl copy to my particular CD copy on my equipment - especially on a lot of older stuff. It is however (often enough for me to notice) sometimes the other way round.

    For example I have a vinyl copy of Sticky Fingers and a CD copy and the CD copy is far superior - in comparison the vinyl version sounds muffled - like listening with socks in yer ears. On the face of just that you mightsay CD was better BUT the vinyl Sticky Fingers is a fairly recent "audiophile" 180g reissue from Virgin. I was given an original copy recently by an uncle and guess what - its as good as the CD and in some respects better. Basically Virgin screwed up the mastering big time on the vinyl reissue - they were just slapdash. This isn't an argument to say the vinyl is better than CD - its an argument to say that there are too many other factors to make a hard and fast statement one way or the other - in this case the mastering was the factor.

    The really early Rolling Stones stuff on the Forty Licks CD kicks the arse out all the early stones stuff I have on vinyl (again a mastering issue I suspect, but this time the other way round).

    My copy of Pink Floyds Meddle on vinyl is better than my CD copy. Reason? Who knows.

    Not sure what you can conclude when its hard to tell the difference. I've a copy of the Byrds Sweetheart of the Rodeo on CD and recently got a Simply vinyl reissue - they both sound great - and both sound so close, I'm not sure you could easily tell the difference. (cracking good album btw).

    I prefer records because physically they are big plastic things with nice big cardboard sleeves, which are great to collect and I'm proud to own. As regards to sound quality, they are certainly good enough for me. I am willing to put up with the hassle, the space they take up and the hit and miss nature of pressing quality, because for me the pros outweigh the cons.

    I also buy CDs, because despite a revival, new music often isn't available on vinyl. CD has its pros too - its a more consistent product, it saves space and the sound quality is generally also good enough for me and I can play them in the car but the cons are that they are cheap looking throwaway items which give me no pride of ownership. Here for me the cons outweigh the pros.

    Obviously I am an old git :MILD:
     
    Uncle Ants, Feb 4, 2004
    #60
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.