the subjective nature of music ?
interesting thread and a good read
I'll stick my neck in for a 2nd forum post although I'm not sure I can think of 10 from the top of my head just yet ? - we'll see
think I'll start on those groups or artists who are considered critically acclaimed , revered and legendary and then move on to sub-group and section other stuff
so ,
#1 - The Beatles - the early black suit pop stuff was nice of its type if you like that sort of thing , the later long hair hippy stuff pushed the odd bounary maybe - overall though much of their stuff bores me stupid

- I'm often told by many people that they influenced everything musically that came after them
#2 - Pink Floyd - despite owning DSOM , and who doesn't ? , I still haven't come to terms with it

- and when I hear the other albums I realise why people think DSOM is so good , I think

- I really like the music from this era in time {late 60s to mid 70s} but Floyd for some reason have never floated my boat
#3 - Neil Young - considered legendary by just about all the music critics and I'm sure he's turned out some good songs ? - for me though he's about as turgid as they come and reminds me of the type of bloke I throw a handful of spare change to when most often spotted slumped in shop doorways
#4 - Sex Pistols - no , your ears weren't wrong the first time you heard them , they really were crap ! - quite what this shower of scratters ever did for music or what they stood for I'm not sure ?
#5 - U2 - initially I thought they could have been good but as time went on it became apparent that The Edge knew of only one way to kick a tune out of a guitar and that Bono fancied himself as some uber-god
#6 - Queen - how can a group that start off quite well end up becoming the most boring and predictable stadium rock act of the 80s ? - because Brian May {much like The Edge} could only tune his guitar one way and dear old Freddie wanted to camp it up on the big stage probably had something to do with it
#7 - Oasis - the 90s Beatles apparently

- strange really , unless this is what people mean about The Beatles giving influence to all that followed ? - to me they're just a group led by a couple of oiks who roll out anthem songs for lager louts & football supporters - lads & geezers music on the whole - I'll add Blur in here as well , just as bad in many ways , that lot thought they were the 90s Kinks
#8 - Coldplay - likeable student pap is about as kind as I could be should somebody ask me to describe their stuff - another critics favourite and for the life of me I fail to see why ? - nothing new going on here with what they do and add to the list all the other alternative next best-things {Franz Ferdinand and the lkes of}
#9 - Madonna - now this lass has turned out the odd good track over time , however when you consider that if the average lass in the street were to buy a child from some far off land as some kind of fashion statement then most of us would think "bleedin' weirdo" - Madge does it and everyone thinks she really is some kind of Madonna

- pretentious , moi ?
#10 - Eminem - now words fail me here ! , well actually they don't but if I was to really describe what I thought then I'd probably not get to make a 3rd post on here - whoever said that this dick had the art of literature comparable to Shakespeare really was on a piss take
and so to other stuff -
Simply Red , Sade , Phil Collins , Dido , etc - what I'd generically term as background dinner party stuff , coffee table CDs , music for people that don't actually like or understand music , birds music - it's all commercially middle of the road and sells I know - but less pain can be had by accidentally stapling your tongue to a desk I'm sure ?
Def Leppard , Bon Jovi , Europe , etc - hair rock , middle of the road rock , the type of rock that gets stuck on a 'drive your car whilst listening to this shite' compilation CD - yet again , where's my stapler ?