Stereo Mic said:If you look carefully, can't you read the word "Wanker" inscribed down the side panels?
Is that on the options list?
I though that was standard fit?

Tazz
Stereo Mic said:If you look carefully, can't you read the word "Wanker" inscribed down the side panels?
Is that on the options list?
julian2002 said:the unbelieving looks and suprised waves i get as a white van acts in a courteous manner is giving me strength.... i've even figgured out how to use the indicators!
In white van man tradition dont spoil things by actually using them though. Follow steps:julian2002 said:i've even figgured out how to use the indicators!
driven by wankers.
See above.I laughed as I overtook three Beemers in a row last winter on snow and ice!!
michaelab said:See above.
Do you think comparing a high-powered RWD car with a 4WD car on snow and ice is remotely relevant?
Stereotypical view - how small mindedStereo Mic said:Of the two I think I'd prefer the Audi because less of them are driven by wankers.
Seems to be the reverse in ScotlandStereo Mic said:Of the two I think I'd prefer the Audi because less of them are driven by wankers.
What! Do you mean that Volvos are sometimes driven by people who are not senile???Dev said:If the driver is a wanker, then it is because he/she is a wanker who happens to be driving a BMW, he/she would be an equally big wanker if he/she was in any other car.
Dev said:
I've never understood why people (tossers?) have a thing for BMWs. The car (especially M3) is great. If the driver is a wanker, then it is because he/she is a wanker who happens to be driving a BMW, he/she would be an equally big wanker if he/she was in any other car. There are some perfectly logical reasons why BMWs attract more than their fair share of wankers but that does not mean the car is bad.