krell amps what price?

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by batemansxxxb, Jan 3, 2005.

  1. batemansxxxb

    alexs2

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    0

    As with so many of your other posts,you seem to wilfully miss the point being made....as you will no doubt already know,the power supply is one of the most fundamental prts of any amplifier,and the power supply reserves incorporated into the older Krells not only allowed them to achieve the "rated watts" but considerably more than that,with the 100W rated KSA100 usually managing over 150W into an 8ohm load.
    More important than that though,as I am sure you will again know,is the ability to continue to deliver power into more difficult loads,especially when many modern loudspeakers are taken into account,and once again the Krells and older Levinsons were able to deliver increasing power with diminishing loads,and the KSA100 would happily deliver over 800W into a 1ohm load.
    This was particularly welcome when the Apogee Scintilla was developed,as the Krell was one of the few amps capable of working with it.

    Whilst you are of course entitled to your own opinions regarding sound quality,you would find yourself fairly isolated in describing the sound quality of Krell amps,as "not even sounding good"...the only exception to this is the KST100.

    You are of course also free to elicit responses in your usual fashion.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 4, 2005
    alexs2, Jan 4, 2005
    #21
  2. batemansxxxb

    Legzr1

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2003
    Messages:
    194
    Likes Received:
    0

    Hohoho - BD selective editing once more.

    Above is Legzs' attempt at editing quotes and taking everything out of context without answering anything.
    Agreed,I have a way to go until I can be called BD2 but there's always hope :)
     
    Legzr1, Jan 4, 2005
    #22
  3. batemansxxxb

    Curt

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    164
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thats the 400xi mate BTW :D

    Curt
     
    Curt, Jan 4, 2005
    #23
  4. batemansxxxb

    BerylliumDust WATCH OUT!!!

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    Messages:
    413
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Nowhere you can find me.
    I always try not to miss the point being made, unless there is no point...

    I agree that power should double when the impedance halves because that's the only way of having a constant voltage source... but you can have it with an amp rated at 200W/8ohm as well as with an amp rated at 50W/8ohm, even with 1 ohm loads. You will only be dependent of speaker`s sensitivity.

    No way you will ever need 800W for normal domestic applications... unless you need a central heater...

    My opinions regarding sound quality are also price conscious... the price doesn't even sound good.
     
    BerylliumDust, Jan 4, 2005
    #24
  5. batemansxxxb

    greg Its a G thing

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Messages:
    1,687
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Wiltshire UK
    Does this opinion span the Krell range or just the pre/pwr combo in question?
     
    greg, Jan 4, 2005
    #25
  6. batemansxxxb

    greg Its a G thing

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Messages:
    1,687
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Wiltshire UK
    I thought the point regards the Apogees was clear and obvious. If one is using Scintillas then you need lots of power and an amp that can drive a 1 Ohm load - there were (and probably still are) limited options. Not having much experience with Rotel pwr amps, how would their natural equivalent fair in your opinion?
     
    greg, Jan 4, 2005
    #26
  7. batemansxxxb

    alexs2

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    0
    This,of course,is utter nonsense,as most amps rated at 200W into 8 ohms are simply incapable of delivering even 50W into a 1 ohm load,and I'm sure you should be well aware of that.

    As to requiring 800W for normal domestic applications,of course,in most cases it will be unneccessary,unless the combination of an insensitive speaker and a short,but very loud transient is factored in,to take your usual extreme example.

    As to price/quality comparisons.....one assumes you may be taking the Rotel 1075/1080 as logical competitors,and whilst cheaper,it seems tat few would place them in the same performance league as even an older Krell.....you do of course have comparitive experience of all of these models,to base your arguments on,no doubt.

    I note also that your comments about the similarity of Krells and Rotels seem somewhat lacking in anything to back them up with....your comments on that would be "interesting".
     
    alexs2, Jan 4, 2005
    #27
  8. batemansxxxb

    wadia-miester Mighty Rearranger

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,026
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Beyond the 4th Dimension
    Hey,

    somebody call Mr Thwack ?,
    Besides all this talk of watts is mere teasing lads, thout need grunt chaps, lots of instantanious heavy current delivery all across the board, at near warp speed :) that should suffice
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 4, 2005
    wadia-miester, Jan 4, 2005
    #28
  9. batemansxxxb

    BerylliumDust WATCH OUT!!!

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    Messages:
    413
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Nowhere you can find me.
    It was you who completly missed the point...

    You can have an amp with 200W @ 8 ohm, 400W @ 4 ohm, and 800W @ 1 ohm;

    or,

    an amp with 50W @ 8 ohm, 100W @ 4 ohm, and 200W @ 1 ohm.

    That doesn't tell you anything about the difference in sound quality of the amps... in fact, chances are that the more powerful amp will sound worse... most definitely worse... besides, you really don't need that kind of power.

    Name three speakers with 1 ohm impedance at some given frequency or with equal or less than 83dB sensitivity.

    Just look inside, or get the circuit diagrams...
     
    BerylliumDust, Jan 4, 2005
    #29
  10. batemansxxxb

    julian2002 Muper Soderator

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,094
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Bedfordshire
    bd,
    sorry but you're being inconsistent there you say that the power output tells you nothing about the quality (which i agree with totally) and then you go on to say that the the chances are that the more powerful amp will sound worse, MOST DEFINATELY worse.

    please apply a bit more internal logic before spouting bollocks in future. 3 demerits and a slapped arse for you me boyo.
    cheers


    julian
     
    julian2002, Jan 4, 2005
    #30
  11. batemansxxxb

    Ya-Boo

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry WM ....IMHO your are talking utter biased bollocks,
    wall paper stripper ???? are you mad ?
    I think demoing cables and listening to Ironmaiden for to long is affecting your jugement dude
    the KSA range of amps are Iconic bits of kit that still cut the mustard today,

    why do you think thet are still so sought after up to 2 decades after production ended .......cos they kick butt......simple

    a 10 yr old NON working KSA250 just sold on flea bay @ £900 wondered why this may be ?

    In 20 yrs time the KSA's will still comand respect good money & and Be sought after
    The Belcantos of this world will be worth jack shit.

    telya what I,ll take BOTH the KSA50 & 100 off your hands save you tripping over them.
    I,ll pay fair money too......as long as your not a certain Jock out to make a quick buck
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 4, 2005
    Ya-Boo, Jan 4, 2005
    #31
  12. batemansxxxb

    penance Arrogant Cock

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    6,004
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Bristol - armpit of the west.
    is that bore still harping on?

    bloody glad i dont bother coming here much now:rolleyes:
     
    penance, Jan 4, 2005
    #32
  13. batemansxxxb

    greg Its a G thing

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Messages:
    1,687
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Wiltshire UK
    Yes I think we got that point but it doesnt really tell us anything.


    You describe opinion like it is fact; you are an empiricist talking like a scientist. In truth that's too kind because an empiricist describes his/her actual experiences, you describe your expectations.

    One minute its all null testing and measurement, the next thing its overstated subjectivism of the worst kind.

    The scintillas are considered amongst the best speaker systems of all time AFAIK - one example is enough.


    Personally I use my ears to judge, but I am interested to know more about how Rotel offers Krell performance, I'm not poo-pooing your stated opinion on that, I'm just keen to know more specific examples/comparisons at a greater level than the recommendation of looking at circuit diagrams.
     
    greg, Jan 4, 2005
    #33
  14. batemansxxxb

    Ya-Boo

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    0
    I,m just wondering what Rotel amp you have heard can even compare with any KSA Krell...... sorry night n day to my ear's that quote of yours gotta be a wind up :D
     
    Ya-Boo, Jan 4, 2005
    #34
  15. batemansxxxb

    wadia-miester Mighty Rearranger

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,026
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Beyond the 4th Dimension
    Sorry Kev, your talking horse plops, they are totally over rated and well compared to a nap 250 in its day (the competition) may well have done something.
    Did we touch a nevre or are you still harbouring carnal thoughts for these heavyweight room heaters?
    Ok you come down with £2750 cash (I still have the box for the 100 and the manual) and you can take em away, but no jibbing over the cost of the fuel :D
     
    wadia-miester, Jan 4, 2005
    #35
  16. batemansxxxb

    wadia-miester Mighty Rearranger

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,026
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Beyond the 4th Dimension
    You got mates now Kev? I'm impressed :eek: chrikey you've been busy :D
    Maybe its a synergry thing?, the scintilla's had no problem been driven with 200.4 at all?
    Nah I've heard many a ksa 300 and the later versions, although my ears were never intact long enough enough to form an opinion other than best use for audio as an aural jack hammer.
    The later ones are much better, although there ability to remove music is an inbuilt feature.
    Now if the B/c is so bad why are you still using it?, though I will say a stock evo4 is a some what off the pace that I'm used too.
    Oh and happy new year, now what about a nap 250 :D
     
    wadia-miester, Jan 4, 2005
    #36
  17. batemansxxxb

    Ya-Boo

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    0
    ya right, no mates in my job ;)
    A Sevenoaks car dealer of { Italian exotica} I,ve known a while, I think you met him at JJ's some quite a while back.....at least his discription of you sounded bout right......Large in every sense of the word :p

    A got the Evo 4 to see what you keep banging on about nothing more
    and yes joking aside It is in some areas better performing than the Krell
    but even the little krell has a REAL soundstage the B/C can only dream about
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 4, 2005
    Ya-Boo, Jan 4, 2005
    #37
  18. batemansxxxb

    Ya-Boo

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    0
    Now if the B/c is so bad why are you still using it?, I've heard many a ksa 300 and the later versions, although my ears were never intact long enough enough to form an opinion other than best use for audio as an aural jack hammer.
    The later ones are much better, although there ability to remove music is an inbuilt feature

    .Now if the B/c is so bad why are you still using it?,

    I,ve never said the B/C is bad.........just over priced IMHO

    seriously
    KSA 300 aside, I,ve only heard that one in somebody elses room so not really
    fair to comment
    I,ve heard the 80s 100 & 250 quite a bit over the yrs and owned 2 50s on and off for over a decade......they all at some stage never fail to impress

    the only common thing I,d pick up on is imagery can be a little wanting at times........for the life of me where you get the wall paper stripping thing from
    I just dont know, even with the Teac P30/DAC1 M/A combi I could not hand on heart say that the krell sounded hard in any way
    In that resect also the Belcanto has never become fatiuging to listen too
    just an amp that you can listen to for hours.
    maybe your right on the system matching thing, I,ve never heard a krell/wadia combi
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 4, 2005
    Ya-Boo, Jan 4, 2005
    #38
  19. batemansxxxb

    alexs2

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    0
    The number of contradictions in certain of the arguments here are amazing.

    In the end though,the thread was one member asking what sort of prices he should expect to pay for a Krell pre and power amp,irrespective of any subjective matters.

    On what one bases a supposition that a more powerful amplifier will "sound worse",I can't imagine,other than it being exactly as some others here have suggested,i.e.overstated subjectivism or worse.

    Other than the presence of transformer(s) resistors,capacitors and transistors,there isn't a huge deal in common between a straightforward Class A/b biassed Rotel,and a Class A Krell.
    There are certainly huge differences in sound quality,which I'd defy you not to notice,even with someone's penchant for null testing.

    Why not get the thread back to what the original intent was,rather than trolling as usual.
     
    alexs2, Jan 4, 2005
    #39
  20. batemansxxxb

    BerylliumDust WATCH OUT!!!

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    Messages:
    413
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Nowhere you can find me.
    Julian,

    You may have exactly the same topology between two different amps yet they can sound considerably different... It's how you implement it that makes the difference between them.

    For instance, when you have a more powerful amplifier you necessarilly need higher gain. Any amplifying device (be it bipolar, mosfet or tube) introduces distortion. Distortion rises for each single gain stage that is added in the circuit... you simply cannot help it.
     
    BerylliumDust, Jan 4, 2005
    #40
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.