...humankind could be divided into aristocrats and commoners. Aristocrats had more mana - ...and the authority that accompanied it - than did commoners. That mana was to a large extent inherited and, if those who posessed it led socially resonsible lives or accomplished memorable deeds, it was enlarged. The qualities of mana...were regarded as manifest more intensely in those aristocrats who posessed the status of 'paramount aristocrats'. Such leaders...most often 'presided' as focal points for community identity and loyalty rather than actively leading their people in war or peace. Their words would be influential in determining tribal strategies, however, for they were seen as potential intermediaries between deities and humankind and between ancestors and descendants.
These categories too were flexible rather than immutable....Some members of artistocrat families lost their status as a result of disregarding community responsibilties or severe social offending - mana was as easily diminished as it was aggregated. Defeated and captured aristocrats became slaves, but they could regain their former status if they succeeded in escaping from thir captors....On the other hand some who lost mana became so dispirited that they declined physically and psychically and died.