penance
Arrogant Cock
does yoga make you fart?
sideshowbob said:So, REL Quake. Any good at all?![]()
-- Ian
lowrider said:I just came back from my Yoga class, please do not disturb... :notworthy
merlin said:A good question Ian. IMHO, Rel subs are vastly overrated and suffer from horrendous levels of distortion that makes them very hard to integrate properly.
penance said:does yoga make you fart?
merlin said:A good question Ian. IMHO, Rel subs are vastly overrated and suffer from horrendous levels of distortion that makes them very hard to integrate properly.
lowrider said:As for the disturbing tentatives of the Tug and company,
sideshowbob said:But if I wasn't too fussed about quality, for instance, if I had an AV system rather than a hifi, they'd be good enough would you say?
-- Ian
analoguekid said:hey Antonio don't rope me in with the Tug, I was just pulling your leg. I'm a pure 2 ch stereo man thru and thru and couldn't really comment on AV sysytems or sub sat systems either.
analoguekid said:No Antonio you are wrong yet again matey, I have a 2 box 3way, speakers run from same xover, cannot be run sperately like what yours can, If you bi wire them they sound awful (then start to sound like the lack of integration you get when you run AV subs or sub sats in stereo).
No arguments this time, you are definately wrong(but then you're used to being wrong)
merlin said:What a shame that the likes of Rel have made the word "sub" such a bad word.
Consequently the word itself conjures up images of distortion and movie sound effects.
I think I prefer the term bass augmentation module (or BAM) for units such as the ART's, Verity and my JBL's. It possibly helps to set them apart from the AV dross.
Are those any good?analoguekid said:... they do have a new range in conventional boxes of similar size to prac studios.
:ffrc: :ffrc: :ffrc: :ffrc: :ffrc:lowrider said:there is no reason for my set not integrating properly, particularly at such low freq as 60hz, of course you may not like the sound, wich I doubt,