Slight "flaws" on the forum

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by PBirkett, Jun 23, 2004.

  1. PBirkett

    sideshowbob Trisha

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    3,092
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    London
    I'd prefer 10pt :)

    The thread view certainly looks bigger to me, but I could be wrong. Am I being ungrateful enough?

    -- Ian
     
    sideshowbob, Jun 24, 2004
    #41
  2. PBirkett

    PBirkett VTEC Addict

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    2,456
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    The Toon
    Actually I prefer it how it is, 10 point is way too small, some of us use high resolutions and dont have the eyes of an eagle, you know ;)
     
    PBirkett, Jun 24, 2004
    #42
  3. PBirkett

    Sgt Rock

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    873
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd like to see the usernames in dingbat 14pt the same colour as the background ;)

    Seriously Michael it's looking quite nice now as is :)
     
    Sgt Rock, Jun 24, 2004
    #43
  4. PBirkett

    michaelab desafinado

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,403
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Lisbon, Portugal
    I think there is more space between the threads in the thread view because of other things that have to fit in there. I'll leave the usernames as 12pt as a compromise.

    Michael
     
    michaelab, Jun 24, 2004
    #44
  5. PBirkett

    Saab

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2004
    Messages:
    1,508
    Likes Received:
    0
    excellent historical lesson Michael,thanks:)

    still not a nice word though
     
    Saab, Jun 24, 2004
    #45
  6. PBirkett

    Paul Ranson

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2003
    Messages:
    1,602
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    An octopus's garden.
    I think massive is an exaggeration considering you're wasting your bandwidth with all the ones I'm not using....

    It will be interesting to see what TonyL comes up with should he upgrade, the 'look and feel' of PFM aligns better with my personal taste than ZG.

    Regardless my subjective impression is that the new version here is slower than the old, I guess you could prove me wrong with actual numbers?

    Paul
     
    Paul Ranson, Jun 24, 2004
    #46
  7. PBirkett

    TonyL Club Krautrock Plinque

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Another pink world
    IMHO vBulletin have put it's users in quite an awkward position with the v3 upgrade. This is a huge change to the software, and predictably it has bloated to a quite absurd extent – the .php and image files that make up the system has bulked up from 1.5Mb to a whopping 5.4Mb. It adds a load of features that many such as myself actively do not want (and a few that I really do). With the new features comes a lot of additional complexity behind the scenes.

    This is also not a easy upgrade to carry out, the whole look and feel is so radically different, and in my opinion the default skin (you get but one) is so truly gross that I wouldn't be seen dead running it – this forces you to develop your own skin immediately (including a new button set as the supplied blue ones look like they were done by a baboon on acid who had watched way too much TV involving Linda Barker - I'm convinced the damn things are made out of MDF). The amount of work Michael has put in getting this place to look like the ZG we all know and love should not be underestimated, a serious amount of effort has gone into this, and I'm genuinely amazed at how successfully he has pulled it off in such a short time. Respect!

    My main concern is how long vBulletin intend to support v2.x – ideally I'd like not to be forced to upgrade, though I'm actually doing some of the preparation work now so I'll have for example a full set of 'non-shite' buttons and icons etc ready for when I may need them. But I'm not going to rush into it until I fully understand the speed and bandwidth aspects. I suspect the new ZG is slower – I always used to think ZG felt faster than pfm, now I feel it's a little slower, especially when waiting for the 'full' post reply page to come up etc.

    I'm learning a lot from ZG with regards to this upgrade, every tweak and improvement Michael is doing is being very carefully noted ;)

    I'm going to take pfm to v2.3.5 first – I'm not even at the latest v2 level! That's easy – it only takes 10 minutes or so. I'll probably wait until the next v3 point release and make a final decision at that point…

    Tony.
     
    TonyL, Jun 25, 2004
    #47
  8. PBirkett

    Robbo

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,371
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Berkshire, UK
    It seems quite appropriate that the true flat earthers dont like the new forum and prefer the old stuff :)

    I think the new software is great, I really like some of the new features, there are also some excellent new features if you are a mod/admin that will likely come in useful.

    I havent noticed the new software being any slower.
     
    Robbo, Jun 25, 2004
    #48
  9. PBirkett

    Graham C

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    680
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Leicestershire
    I'd say its slower than breakfast TV
     
    Graham C, Jun 25, 2004
    #49
  10. PBirkett

    PBirkett VTEC Addict

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    2,456
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    The Toon
    I'd say I have noticed no difference. Maybe it is a split second slower (but only maybe), but frankly, who cares? Hardly worth getting upset over IMO. FWIW, I prefer v3 to v2, for the average user, its features are better and certainly worth having.
     
    PBirkett, Jun 25, 2004
    #50
  11. PBirkett

    michaelab desafinado

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,403
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Lisbon, Portugal
    I think it probably is a tad slower, afterall the pages are bigger so that would follow. However, my subjective impression is that it's not noticably slower. IMO it's worth it :)

    Michael.
     
    michaelab, Jun 25, 2004
    #51
  12. PBirkett

    Paul Ranson

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2003
    Messages:
    1,602
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    An octopus's garden.
    I'm hardly getting upset.

    Part of the subjective slowness may be that it works the client harder and I often use a 5 year old Toshiba notebook for browsing.

    Paul
     
    Paul Ranson, Jun 25, 2004
    #52
  13. PBirkett

    Nepherim Deep Purple Flactulence

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    131
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NJ, USA
    Invision is a great forum substitute for vBulletin :)
     
    Nepherim, Jun 26, 2004
    #53
  14. PBirkett

    michaelab desafinado

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,403
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Lisbon, Portugal
    There's no way I'm even going to think about switching forum software. I evaluated the alternatives when I started ZG and vBulletin won hands down against competition like phpBB and Invision and I doubt the situation has changed, especially with the release of vB3 :)

    Michael.
     
    michaelab, Jun 26, 2004
    #54
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.